[Libreoffice] Want to act like a pornstar? Ram a blu-colored tab!

2011-04-20 Thread Jo
The hottest method to gratify your wife! http://rhyscartwright.co.uk/tgtmy57.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi Michael, Le 20/04/11 15:44, Michael Meeks a écrit : [...] It's very strange than this line was deleted ! I try to find the origine of this delete with "qgit" and "gitk". But I can't find it ! It seems you found it, and it was an error; nice work. Yes, I found the patch, but not th

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#bug 36404 -More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi All, In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems : "vcl119: #i80730# fix cursor paint behavior and timer" I've tried to find an explication of this deleted ligne, but without Timer.Stop() I don't understand how it can work correctly. I'm not sure of that. It's p

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Kami, all! Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2011, 17:14 +0200 schrieb KAMI911 KAMI911: > Hi Fellowship of Programmers, ??? :-) > We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we > decided to try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated > module. Are there any ongoing develo

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Re: complete

2011-04-20 Thread Timo
Hi, I don´t know where the master is and how the scp2-directory works. Here is a diff from debians mailmerge.py. mailmerge.py.diff is licensed under LGPLv3+. The license text for MsgBox is inside the file. Within debian libreoffice obviously never uses the built in python. Note that now python e

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-design] Git Artwork guide

2011-04-20 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Björn, this is just amazing - thanks! After giving it an initial try a few months ago, I never spend more time to explore Git a bit further ... And also a big "thank you" to Thorsten who already added his great "icon workflow" :-) Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2011, 11:12 +0200 schrieb Bjoern Michael

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > > As we discussed before, java is not preferred around LibreOffice. That's true for core functionality, but java-extensions are perfectly fine... ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing li

[Libreoffice] Cleaning sal/inc/osl/file.hxx

2011-04-20 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, after removing all redundant #defines from file.hxx (last change not yet pushed - build is going on) I had a look at the enum RC. At a first glance it seems that e.g. E_None is used only in pyuno_module.cxx (and in some comments in file.hxx) and could be replaced by the value osl_File_E_N

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:41:16 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > :-) from 10k feet anything in clone/ure/ is the public > ABI/API. Including the sometimes very creative library naming. > That includes some monumental performance blunders - such as > the 'store' code, and the IDL interfaces

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello, I CC'ed Nguyen Hong Quang, the one who has founded MHST. (2011/04/20 14:47), Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Could you enlighten us about some points about MHST? Perhaps Mr. Quang can do that better than me :) Is it working exactly like GSoc (1 student, 1 project, one potential winner) or is

Re: [Libreoffice] When can we import xml data

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Fernand, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 18:43 +0200, Fernand Vanrie wrote: > Thanks for your interest, With xml-data i mean a data-dump from a SQL > database. Fine - so please open the bug as requested: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ And please provide a sample XML document, an

Re: [Libreoffice] OSL_ASSERT - remove backtrace or make abort

2011-04-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Lubos Lunak wrote: > I'd like to remove the backtrace printing from OSL_ASSERT and friends, or, > even better and if possible, make these functions work properly, i.e. abort > on failure (I'm not really holding my breath on the second one, but refusing > that one will at least support the first

Re: [Libreoffice] When can we import xml data

2011-04-20 Thread Fernand Vanrie
Hi Michael , Thanks for your interest, With xml-data i mean a data-dump from a SQL database. Where records becomes rows and fields becomes columbs. MS Exel can flawless open this xml-files. The xml structure depends on the Table of the database but mostly its something like: 1 76497 ANCWe

Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:06 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > So I should create option like --enable-oxygenoffice, and add my > stuffs here ? All things depending in the code directly ? I couldn't see my reply elsewhere. But I would add an OxygenOffice distro config in distro-con

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Thorsten, Michael, As we discussed before, java is not preferred around LibreOffice. That is why we decided to check the possible ways. However we have a never (interm) release with more diagrams, possibilities like converting between diagrams, etc. What do you think about? I hope we can gang u

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we decided to > try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated module. Are there > any ongoing development to create SmartArt related thing? Maybe the best > would be to as like the Chart2 module. But

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:35:47 +0200 Andreas Radke wrote: > This has not happened when using plain beta1 source and using > make OODESTDIR=foo install. The only thing changed there was OODESTDIR to DESTDIR. So it should stay in the sandbox. Would you mind to pastebin the log of the installer and

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Miklos Vajna píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 17:00 +0200: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:27:51PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > The build repo is not tagged. We would like to get rid of it. > > Hi Petr, > > One question: the old build repo created .txt filelists in the build/ > directory which helped crea

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Michael, Does it provide user interface for LO to create such smart arts? Where is the current code, branch? Best regards, KAMI 2011/4/20 Michael Meeks > Hi Kami, > > On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:14 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > > We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so

Re: [Libreoffice] PyUno is Python 3 compatible

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Becker
Hi Hanno, First of all, it has nothing to do with that patch. In configure.in, AM_PATH_PYTHON([2.2]) check is done. You can look into aclocal.m4 line 205 ff. and try to debug. You should perhaps update automake (my version is 1.11). Maybe is works when you set $PYTHON=python before running autoge

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Lubos, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:08 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread > grow into a monster, but could it be said more specifically what we cannot > fix currently ? :-) from 10k feet anything in clone/ure/ is the

Re: [Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kami, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:14 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we > decided to try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated > module. Nice ! :-) > Are there any ongoing development to create SmartArt relate

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Thanks for your work but I'm running into a permission issue: ==> Entering fakeroot environment... ==> Starting package_libreoffice()... Installing in /usr/lib/libreoffice... mkdir /usr/lib/libreoffice: Permission denied at /build/src/build/solenv/bin/ooinstall line 32 make: *** [install] Error 2

Re: [Libreoffice] release plan : inconsistency between 3.3.3 and 3.4

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Pierre, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:45 +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > jumping late into the subject, but :-) > On 04/11/2011 12:25 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > The plan is (of course), to keep releasing 3.3.x releases as long as > > people are interested in creating them I

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 16:43 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi all, > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:02:06 +0100 > Michael Meeks > wrote: > > Having said that - I think we probably want to have a > > flag-day at some stage perhaps a 4.0, and it is worth collecting > > things we want t

[Libreoffice] Smart art like functionality

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Fellowship of Programmers, We are very excited about the possibilities of LibreOffice, so we decided to try to rewrite Diagram extension [1] in C as a separated module. Are there any ongoing development to create SmartArt related thing? Maybe the best would be to as like the Chart2 module. But

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 20 of April 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > And of course, we should extend the above list to cover all our pet > hates that we can't currently fix IMHO. I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread grow into a monster, but could it be said more sp

Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-20 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Michael, So I should create option like --enable-oxygenoffice, and add my stuffs here? All things depending in the code directly? How should I make the download conditional? I really don't want to enforce anybody to download our extra stuffs, extensions, etc without using --enable-extra-galle

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:27:51PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > The build repo is not tagged. We would like to get rid of it. Hi Petr, One question: the old build repo created .txt filelists in the build/ directory which helped creating subpackages: we could just read lang_*_list.txt to split lan

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Michael, Thanks for expose your opinion, it's so much professional than mine. :-) Best regards, Júlio. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] complete

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Timo, On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 17:50 +0200, Timo wrote: > Maybe this task should be moved to “completed”? > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Make_python_.2F_mail-merge_debuggable I read your last mail, and I was not certain that it is working :-) so sadly the code didn't get

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 16:08 +0200: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 > Petr Mladek wrote: > > > I did some changes. I made the "libreoffice" dirname configurable by > > --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, > > libdir values in Makefile.in. >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Dargaud
After a long reflection, I confirm that this gigantesque contribution is under LGPLv3+/MPL Bob Le 20/04/11 16:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: And I've found a missing "returnVal = sal_True;" in "salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx" Nice work

Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Michael, Hi all, On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:02:06 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > Having said that - I think we probably want to have a > flag-day at some stage perhaps a 4.0, and it is worth collecting > things we want to do then, so we remember to do them all - I suggest > having a tracker bu

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > [how to tell what revisions are buildable] > >        Beyond that - what you could easily do - is to help out by hacking some > support into 'g' to download a set of revisions in a text file (one per > module) and checkout those versio

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] letter wizard template files packed and installed in two copies fdo#35722

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:22 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > Windows installer size could be further reduced, if letter wizard > template files would not be packed in two copies for 26 languages. Nice - fixes 35722 and shrinks our installer :-) presumably (as l10n guru) you're happy that ther

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 04. 2011 v 19:27 +0200: > Hi, > > I have just created the libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag for 3.4.0-beta2 release. We are sorry but some wrong strings caused build breakage for some localizations. You might want to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.99.2-hotfix1 from the translations

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 21:04 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > May we close this fdo#36399 bug then? Indeedie - always worth closing it if it got fixed; I just did that myself :-) Thanks guys, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engine

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200 Petr Mladek wrote: > I did some changes. I made the "libreoffice" dirname configurable by > --with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix, > libdir values in Makefile.in. > > The result is that the installation path is "/usr/local/lib/libreo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello all May we close this fdo#36399 bug then? Best Regards -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 20:44, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: >> Last week, my answer was "no". But this evening, after many printf, it's >> "ye

[Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 23:17 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > IMHO doing a "gradual migration" is not a good idea here. Such > things should be done in one deep cut, because: So - I think the tread came up with the right answer - which is 'later'; on this. Nevertheless,

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Robert, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:44 +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: > Last week, my answer was "no". But this evening, after many printf, it's > "yes" I've a patch who fixe this bug ;-) Nice ! :-) > It's very strange than this line was deleted ! I try to find the origine > of this dele

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Mladek
Hanno Meyer-Thurow píše v St 20. 04. 2011 v 11:25 +0200: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 > Andreas Radke wrote: > > > ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). > > Hi all, > I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need > to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to configure to

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christian Lohmaier < lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Samphan Raruenrom > wrote: > > Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ > > Doing it this was is near impossible, as the repository is split into > mul

Re: [Libreoffice] If you got bounce notification, all is fine again

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Thanks for your answer :) Best Regards -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 20:10, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Korrawit, > > We ban spammers from time to time manually; the ideal solution would > mean updates in the freedesktop.org infrastructure, I am afraid. > > Regards, > Kendy >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-20 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello all, After finding in the history, I found that this line was IMHO accidentally deleted. http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/diff/libs-gui/vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx?r2=%2Flibs-gui%2Fvcl%2Funx%2Fgtk%2Fgdi%2Fsalnativewidgets-gtk.cxx%40944a11c1750f09de52d7623b313e3fd4ace56747&r1=%2Fli

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-20 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Thank you all for the replies, was a great discussion. :-) I won't persist in this idea, even discording in the actual situation. Let's go back for coding... $ cd libo/wizards/com/sun/star/wizards :-( Regards, Júlio. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Samphan, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:09 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > Building LibreOffice from master or 3.4 branch is hard for beginners > because we don't know which point in time that the branch are > buildable on one's platform. Yes - this is bad; Caolan's idea was to have tags f

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
After discussing this with Michael it seems the best solution would be to use python-config, it even makes configure.in smaller ;) Please test it with python3 too. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..4dd7a4e 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4107,12 +4107,9 @@ e

[Libreoffice] make install broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:25:39 +0200 schrieb Hanno Meyer-Thurow : > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 > Andreas Radke wrote: > > > ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). > > Hi all, > I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need > to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to confi

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
Better diff (note that this still requires a shared library and will not work static ones): diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..0d06542 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4108,11 +4108,11 @@ elif test -n "$with_system_python" -o -n "$with_system_libs" && \ A

[Libreoffice] Summary: LibreOffice TSC call - Thur Apr 14th - 16:00 UTC

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, sorry for the late post, here a short summary of the last TSC call: attendants: Kohei, Petr, Kendy, Norbert, David, Fridrich, Cedric, Bjoern 3.4 status (Petr): - beta-1 upload should give us a better picture where we are by user feedback - beta-2 and further steps should de

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36285, which changed state. Bug 36285 Summary: LibO 3.4 beta1 – No available language modules, spell check is impossible https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36285 What|Old Value

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36404 --- Comment #29 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-20 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ Doing it this was is near impossible, as the repository is split into multiple ones. > Building LibreOffice from master or 3.4 branch is hard for beginners because > we don't know wh

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 10:14), Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:52 +0200, Andreas Becker wrote: > > Really not. > > The reason is, that the old version does not always work: > > For me, print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('VERSION')); prints > > "3.2", but the library

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 07:42 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: > The reason we have our own version of Gsoc in Vietnam is that > students' English skill is not so good. Ho hum :-) I'd feel a lot better if you guys worked with Google to translate task specifications to Vietnamese and stuc

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] An updated Autolayout patch

2011-04-20 Thread cocofan
This is another updated set of Autolayout patches. I think I managed to get the custom layout to work but sometimes there is a segmentation fault connected with using a literal string (will investigate later). The reading and writing to the xml file doesn't work right so it has been disabled for

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200 Andreas Radke wrote: > ... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me). Hi all, I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to configure to behave. Otherwise it installs to /LIBDIR. Improvements to the patch are w

[Libreoffice] Git Artwork guide

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi designers, Hi developers, following the discussion on: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/756895 I created a short tutorial for designers on how to get setup to contribute artwork directly to the project at without a complete build: http://wiki.documentfoundation.or

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:52 +0200, Andreas Becker wrote: > Really not. > The reason is, that the old version does not always work: > For me, print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('VERSION')); prints > "3.2", but the library is libpython3.2mu.so. .. > The absolute path in my patch i

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 09:52), Andreas Becker wrote: > Robert, > my patch: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=6c3539d8e1dbad13264b862e1344e3c3a8690dec > your patch: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=2b03888a918b7020a1f9330686dc53122

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:22:46 +0100 Noel Power wrote: > On 19/04/11 22:09, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > You*did* run the smoketest didn't you. I'm sure you did. > you *are* joking right? such confidence in me doing the right thing > is completely misplaced, I am ashamed I didn't run it :-( I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-20 Thread Noel Power
On 19/04/11 22:09, Caolán McNamara wrote: You*did* run the smoketest didn't you. I'm sure you did. you *are* joking right? such confidence in me doing the right thing is completely misplaced, I am ashamed I didn't run it :-( I did some touch testing with basic but I have to admit running

[Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Becker
Robert, my patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=6c3539d8e1dbad13264b862e1344e3c3a8690dec your patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=2b03888a918b7020a1f9330686dc531222057573 > as far as i saw the reason to use an absolut

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Vu Hung, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 00:26 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: > As for the regulation of MHST, > I propose that I will firstly register LibO team as a mentor; and I > will take care > of the Vietnam side. Could you enlighten us about some points about MHST? Is it working exactly li

Re: [Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:10:25 + schrieb Baptiste Daroussin : > Hi, > > I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I > can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the > mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed > anymore? > > reg

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC, help conversion

2011-04-20 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hallo Timo, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 01:57 +0200, Timo wrote: > do you have questions or comments about my project proposal*? This week > I am available until Thursday evening (UTC). Let the comments happen in the proposal's comments. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documen

Re: [Libreoffice] OSL_ASSERT - remove backtrace or make abort

2011-04-20 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I fully agree. We need to make it clear what assertions really mean, and how they should be used. Currently it is somewhat of a disaster area. There are places in the code that cause "assertion failures" every time the code is run if built with debug=t. So does that then mean that the code is ac