Le 04/05/11 04:00, Peter Teeson a écrit :
Hi Peter,
= libs-core =
Cloning into libs-core...
remote: Counting objects: 2955
Looks like the clone of the repo either stalled or timed-out or was just
very, very slow. The only alternative is to try again, I guess, unless
someone
I'm not sure I understand this: does this mean that RC releases are not
considered temporary builds and will be allowed to replace the previous
stable build?
Yes, that is more or less the definition of release candidate, isn't it?
Please remember that it in principle isn't known in advance
Le 04/05/11 07:26, Andras Timar a écrit :
Will Beta4 overwrite my stable 3.3.2?
Which quite frankly, is a very uncomfortable situation.
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Le Tue, 3 May 2011 14:23:44 +0200,
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 06:58:29PM +0200, Sébastien Le Ray wrote:
if(aShadowColor != SwViewOption::GetShadowColor() ) {
aShadowColor = SwViewOption::GetShadowColor();
-AlphaMask aMask(
Hi Alex,
On 2011-05-03 at 14:52 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
The question will also arise when testing nightly/daily builds as
to which branch of the repo actually represents the build - my
understanding is that the nightly/daily is from master - this is not the
same as the
Hi all,
Attempting to build from master with the following switches :
./autogen.sh 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0' --with-max-jobs=4
--with-num-cpus=2 --with-lang=en-US de fr ru --enable-epm
--with-epm=internal --with-extension-integration
--with-system-mysql-cppconn --disable-systray
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36820
Hi Christina,
On 2011-05-03 at 20:35 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
static void prefixShapePropertiesFromDFF (const SvxMSDffHandle* pData,
com::sun::star::beans::PropertyValues rPropValues)
with prefix = lcl_ or [Ii]mpl - is one of these prefices more
modern than the others? What about
Hi Tor
Thank you for your clear answers!
Yes, that is more or less the definition of release candidate, isn't it?
Please remember that it in principle isn't known in advance which release
candidate is good enough to be declared a release. The last release
candidate is *exactly* the same as
Le 04/05/11 09:20, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
Hi Kendy,
Some of the tinderboxes cover master, but most important at this stage
is of course the release branch; these are builds of exactly the code
that is going to be tagged as betas / RCs.
Thanks for the links, I'd already noticed that
Hi *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
[...]
Will Beta4 overwrite my stable 3.3.2?
3.4(.0) beta 4 will, yes.
Well, that is still to be questioned - as there are other packaging
bugs that have not been resolved yet.
So it will conflict with an
Hey there,
can some1 please review the attached patch for 3.4? Export of xlsx docs
containing images or charts (GraphicObjectShape) fails with generic cannot
write error (there is no particular bug id. associated with the issue so far
... but I didn't search fdo bugzilla so well)
The
Hi Bubli,
thanks for the patch! I didn't realize that the code is also used by
other parts of OOXML export and that it will fire exception in the case
the property is missing for calc and writer objects.
The patch looks good, but I think you should keep the test whether =
operator succeeded.
Hi *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Same issue had happened to me. I would like an explanation as to why cloning
is so slow. Just to clone all the repos it took me about 18 hrs at about 20
to 25 kbps
It's not only cloning, but also pulling.
Wish to act like a xxxstar? Ram a great tab! http://ram-molek.com/ohxksg8f.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Alex,
On 2011-05-04 at 10:31 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Some of the tinderboxes cover master, but most important at this stage
is of course the release branch; these are builds of exactly the code
that is going to be tagged as betas / RCs.
Thanks for the links, I'd already
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||35706
--- Comment #56 from
Hi Jan
Could this also be the case for daily Windows builds?
There is a single daily build (from April 20th) at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Windows_Release_Configuration/
--
View this message in context:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #57 from clio fyv...@ya.ru 2011-05-04 03:42:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #56)
Is there any bug number for this?
No.
Also note these Basic IDE bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30545#c7
I suggest to open
Hi Plino,
On 2011-05-04 at 03:20 -0700, plino wrote:
Could this also be the case for daily Windows builds?
There is a single daily build (from April 20th) at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Windows_Release_Configuration/
There have been troubles with random hangs of that box -
Also I can't see nothing populated here
Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/
Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/
Cheers,
Antón
2011/5/4 Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz:
Hi Plino,
On 2011-05-04 at 03:20 -0700, plino wrote:
Could this also be the case for daily Windows builds?
There is a single
Hi Ron,
On 2011-05-04 at 19:41 +1000, Ron House wrote:
I posted this some time ago and no one replied. Can anyone help with
this problem. Simply put, the standard download of the source won't
build. I did:
git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap libo
cd libo
thanks for the patch! I didn't realize that the code is also used by
other parts of OOXML export and that it will fire exception in the case
the property is missing for calc and writer objects.
The patch looks good, but I think you should keep the test whether =
operator succeeded. Like:
On 2011-05-04 at 13:22 +0200, Anton Meixome wrote:
Also I can't see nothing populated here
Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/
Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/
Eh? Click the libreoffice-3-4/ subdir, or describe your problem better.
Kendy
___
Hello,
for the import of the sheet local anonymous db data from excel I had to
create a new UNO interface that supports calc's new sheet local db data.
I attached my first version that compiles without any errors. But I'm open
to any suggestion about better concepts or renaming of the interface.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36838
--- Comment #58 from
On 04/05/2011 11:21, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Same issue had happened to me. I would like an explanation as to why cloning
is so slow. Just to clone all the repos it took me about 18 hrs at about 20
to 25
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 17th week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:LO-3.5 development
+ libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.0 release
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.3 bug fix release
On 04/05/2011 15:29, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Jonathan, *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Christian if load is an issue why not setup load balancing and put in more
network cards into the server and spread the load across the network
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #59 from Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de
2011-05-04 06:51:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #49)
There are a number of bugs here that are long standing, [...]
On
Hi *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
After the initial clone gits fine for me after that. Is there a list i can
join so i can email em and ask them about this?
http://www.freedesktop.org/admin/blog
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #60 from clio fyv...@ya.ru 2011-05-04 06:59:12 PDT ---
This could be a stopper (if confirmed): Bug 36816 – Document statistics:
Paragraph Count doesn't work
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36306
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36483
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|36483 |36843
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #63 from Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com 2011-05-04
07:59:33 PDT ---
Sorry, my bad mixed up 4 and 8 in bug number dependencies, corrected now.
Alex
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:29 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hello,
for the import of the sheet local anonymous db data from excel I had
to create a new UNO interface that supports calc's new sheet local db
data.
I attached my first version that compiles without any errors. But I'm
On 5/4/11, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
That's unfortunate :-( - Norbert, please, it seems something went wrong
with the MacOSX tinderbox, it does not upload any recent build, can you
check?
I won't be able to fix it until friday (on the road, and that machine
is _not_ accessible
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:58 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
void setNewByTable( [in] long nTab, [in]
com::sun::star::table::CellRangeAddress aRange )
raises( com::sun::star::lang::IndexOutOfBoundsException );
Actually now I prefer setByTable without the 'New'. The method could be
I'm fine with nearly everything. And your suggestion looks even a bit better
than mine, except for the setByTable method.
I was thinking about adding the table index too, but stumbled over the case
when the table index does not match the table the db data refers to. We have
a similar problem in
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 18:23 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
I'm fine with nearly everything. And your suggestion looks even a bit
better than mine, except for the setByTable method.
I was thinking about adding the table index too, but stumbled over the
case when the table index does not match
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36849
--
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 18:55 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
At the moment there is no case where this happens, but there may be
someone in the future who will think of this as a good idea to solve a
problem. It's the same reason made me write the lines that check for
the index of the table: as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #64 from vitriol vitriol_vitr...@katamail.com 2011-05-04 11:05:54
PDT ---
Nominating bug 36848. Named range can not be selected with Name Box. Regression
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
So all your suggestions are included into the new patch.
I'll try now to get the import use this new interface.
Regards,
Markus
2011/5/4 Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 18:55 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
At the moment there is no case where this happens, but there
Well I resumed the first build and it seems as though the downloads did
finally complete.
But the post download checks indicate incomplete dependencies.
What to do from here?
(Don't get me wrong - I do appreciate this is all volunteer effort)
(But I'm not used to this anymore... I'm on a Mac
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 20:20 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
So all your suggestions are included into the new patch.
Looks lovely. Please commit to master (I assume you've been granted git
access?)
One thing I overlooked. In the license header you need to replace
[ insert your name / company
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36838, which changed state.
Bug 36838 Summary: soffice/oosplash.bin does not process relative paths to
documents
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36838
What|Old Value |New
Just cherry-picked to libreoffice-3-4 from master:
commit 1a790d00100183abfa71666d437af9115940c32a
Author: Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
Date: Wed May 4 20:27:43 2011 +0100
fix fdo#36838 by avoiding -L argument to pagein
diff --git a/desktop/source/pagein/pagein.c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36849, which changed state.
Bug 36849 Summary: EDITING: Calc crashes while editing Excel file
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36849
What|Old Value |New Value
Pushed to master.
2011/5/4 Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 20:20 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
So all your suggestions are included into the new patch.
Looks lovely. Please commit to master (I assume you've been granted git
access?)
One thing I overlooked. In
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:30 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote:
Well I resumed the first build and it seems as though the downloads
did finally complete. But the post download checks indicate
incomplete dependencies.
Ho hum - that is unfortunate; it is possible that you're missing
Hi Thorsten, *,
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36437
didn't go in??
That's very sad, as it is already fixed.
Version was planned as rc initially, where the fix would not be
useful.
Agreed, same assumption from my side.
Le 04/05/11 20:30, Peter Teeson a écrit :
Well I resumed the first build and it seems as though the downloads did
finally complete.
But the post download checks indicate incomplete dependencies.
What to do from here?
Try the following, it has worked for me in the past
1) git pull ./g
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|36678 |
--
Configure bugmail:
All,
I just noticed that we now have NEEDINFO as one of the status values.
We were previously setting NEEDINFO in the whiteboard to indicate the
bug needs more info from the reporter, but maybe we can start using the
NEEDINFO status for that instead.
Just FYI,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida,
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 21:09 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
All,
I just noticed that we now have NEEDINFO as one of the status values.
We were previously setting NEEDINFO in the whiteboard to indicate the
bug needs more info from the reporter, but maybe we can start using the
NEEDINFO status
Hi all,
libreoffice-3-4 built successful but make dev-install fails : it tries
to create /install (Rootpath=/install !?!) and obviously has not the
rights to do that.
Perhaps some . is missing before /install but I do not know where to fix
that. Does anybody has a clue?
It worked fine the day
58 matches
Mail list logo
