> Cудeбная пpaктикa в земeльных и cтрoительных oтнoшeниях:
защитa интepесов сoбственников, apeндаторов, зacтройщиков
> Cеминар • 16 июня • 2011 г.
> Kиев • Гopького, 172 • Бизнeс-цeнтр «Пaлладиум Cити»
> Тeл.: (044) 223-4882 и 223-5141
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
> Think about it - less work for You in total ;o))
>
Hi Friedrich,
well, I don't care at all where the list is located - I just
recalled the across-the-board rule of having reply-to-mangling
active on the TDF lists, so I wanted to spare me the discussion.
Also, purely
On 4 June 2011 19:03, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Now, I think I have a very little knowledge of how things work in KCachegrind.
> And I started to doubt if it is possible to do what I thought should
> be done. (maybe everything is possible but it may be too complicated)
> I thought to hi
Hi all,
mainly I spent this week on reading source code and api documentation.
Now I am aware of several properties exposed by the DrawPage,
MasterPage and Shape services. I have created several simple test
presentations with Impress, and then I followed step by step the
svg export process by usi
Hi all,
*please, follow up on the projects list, thanks in advance*
I would like to try to organize a first session of manual tests -
release scenarios - on Litmus [1]. Mostly to see how it goes and fine
tune what needs to be done to go further. We need to push our QA process
further and log
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Christian Lohmaier <
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi William, *,
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:01 PM, William Lachance wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Christian Lohmaier
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/lib
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||35784
--- Comment #137 from Cor Nouws 2011-
Christina.
commit libs-gui:b247a329c5ca9f8cd1e84fbaca3456be71a87fbfRemoved
lines from merge conflicts
When you run into a hick-up like that (a belated gitt pull -r that
conflicted right ?), and that is _before_ you pushed the offending
commit, it would be nicer to 'amend' the previous commit
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how many different compilers are used for Mac/Windows? Could we just try if
> they accept the varargs syntax? Or is there more testing needed?
I'm pretty certain now that __VAR_ARGS__ is supported by all the
compiler we use.
>
> M
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Joop Kiefte wrote:
> But are the implementations compatible?
Variable-argument macros were introduced in the ISO/IEC 9899:1999
(C99) revision of the C programming language standard in 1999.
Surely gcc is C99 compliant (and Mac use gcc 4.0.1)
and Visual Studio 20
Hi Kami,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:54:04 +0200
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
> I put direct launcher to main parts of LibO to StartCenter desktop
> file. These starters are usable under Unity of Ubuntu.
>
> Here is the patch:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=572c84d696926132b
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
> I would like to here any suggestions before I change anything UI related.
So, there are two things that I could see us changing.
One is to update the progress bar only once per sheet, instead of once
per column in each sheet.
Sorry I cannot check, Ubuntu here...
2011/6/5 Chr. Rossmanith :
> Hi,
>
> how many different compilers are used for Mac/Windows? Could we just try if
> they accept the varargs syntax? Or is there more testing needed?
>
> Maybe there are more pieces of code which would be better readable if using
>
Hi,
how many different compilers are used for Mac/Windows? Could we just try
if they accept the varargs syntax? Or is there more testing needed?
Maybe there are more pieces of code which would be better readable if
using varargs? So if we know it for this situation we know it for future
case
Hello,
Perhaps try to delete the repertory
/home/thuswa/work/tmp/libo/solver/350/unxlngi6.pro then compile.
If it doesn't work, clean all the unxlng* with a make clean
then recompile the whole thing.
Julien.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> Sorry, but you *based* your conclusion of the inevitability of there being
>> 2 projects on the *ideology* of copyleft vs non-copyleft.
>
> I did that because the diversity of the world of FOSS is a clearly observable
> fact. You observe a dif
On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> Hey, chill. As Sam says, there's no ideology involved, just choices. The last
> thing I want is an ideological debate because I already know how it turns
> out. That's why I think it would be far better not to keep making proposals
> whose m
On 5 Jun 2011, at 16:57, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>
>> Hey, chill. As Sam says, there's no ideology involved, just choices. The
>> last thing I want is an ideological debate because I already know how it
>> turns out. That's why I think it wou
On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> But just
>> recall that even the FSF admits that AL2.0 is the best license
>> where free/open standards are competing with non-free/proprietary
>> ones.
>
> See Bradley Kuhn's rebuttals to Rob Weir[2][3].
"You should only do that when there
But are the implementations compatible?
2011/6/5 Norbert Thiebaud :
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> any Mac or Windows opinions?
>
> according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variadic_macro
> "The GNU Compiler Collection, since 3.0, C++Builder 2006 and Visual
On 5 Jun 2011, at 16:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
> Personally, I don't think it's "inevitable" at all, nor do I
> think it the place for people to make such statements on behalf
> of communities that they have, as far as I know, only limited associations
> with.
Actually I am a TDF Member and ha
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any Mac or Windows opinions?
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variadic_macro
"The GNU Compiler Collection, since 3.0, C++Builder 2006 and Visual
Studio 2005 [1] support variable-argument macros, both when compiling
C and C+
On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> The plain fact is that Apache's rules do not allow any section of
> Apache-maintained code to be licensed under copyleft licenses. That means
> that groups of people who have made the the equally valid choice to have
> their work licensed un
There's an important concept in Michael Meeks' e-mail that mustn't get lost:
On 4 Jun 2011, at 17:03, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> The problem is, that very much of our work is inter-dependent, and we
> want people to be able to work all over the code, cleaning, translating
> and fixing it. It
Translate the remaining german code comments in writer/sw/source/ui/misc
to english!
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/misc/glossary.hrc|8 +-
sw/source/ui/misc/glshell.cxx | 13 ++--
sw/sou
Translate a part of german code comments in writer/sw/source/ui/misc to
english!
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/misc/bookmark.cxx | 25 +++---
sw/source/ui/misc/docfnote.cxx | 42 +++-
sw/sourc
Hi there!
My comment translation is still in progress. Here comes another directory
of writer. These changes have already been _pushed_ to master!
So please review them, just complain and tell me what to change or go
ahead and place your changes on top of mine.
thanks,
martin
_
I've got a report that ArchLinux LibreOffice SDK package is not usable
right now: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24581
The preset directory values are still not taking over in the
installation process. I know in the past we did some sed hack like
Coalan still does for Fedora. I thought this is ob
Its the same logic
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could someone please double check that the new if statement is equivalent
> to the old one...
>
> sal/osl/unx/file_url.cxx |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sal/osl/un
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
Hi Olivier, *,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Olivier Hallot
wrote:
In a recent post in the info list, a professor asked to add the symbol
∄
non exist
Unicode symbol: U+2204 THERE DOES NOT EXIST ∄
Let alone that OpenSymbol doesn't contain the
Hi,
(and now to the list and not only to Oliver. I hate this mailing list
settings)
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Hi
Just a simple question on adding new math symbols to LO Math.
In a recent post in the info list, a professor asked to add the symbol
∄
non exist
Unicode symbol: U
Hi Olivier, *,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Olivier Hallot
wrote:
>
> In a recent post in the info list, a professor asked to add the symbol
>
> ∄
> non exist
> Unicode symbol: U+2204 THERE DOES NOT EXIST ∄
Let alone that OpenSymbol doesn't contain the characte yet..
> However, it looks lik
Hi,
any Mac or Windows opinions?
Christina
Am 16.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Michael Meeks:
Hi Christina,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 21:40 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
if I remember correctly cppcheck complained about some statements in the
context of OSL_FILE_TRACE. This patch simplifies the definit
Hi,
could someone please double check that the new if statement is
equivalent to the old one...
sal/osl/unx/file_url.cxx |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sal/osl/unx/file_url.cxx b/sal/osl/unx/file_url.cxx
index a005cc8..858a7d7 100644
--- a/sal/osl/un
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 12:08:42 +0200
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> I don't have librsvg natively on MacOSX, and I already have gio, so I
> don't understand why it isn't being recognised instead of requiring
> libgsf, unless it is a compiler linking problem ??
So, if there is GIO for linux, windows,
Le 05/06/11 10:50, Hanno Meyer-Thurow a écrit :
Hi Hanno,
> Old versions of librsvg required libgsf for svgz files.
> Newer versions default to Glib/GIO for zipped svg files.
> Glib and librsvg are new enough in the LO repository.
>
> So, it is quite strange to depend on libgsf at all but if
>
Hi!
I put direct launcher to main parts of LibO to StartCenter desktop
file. These starters are usable under Unity of Ubuntu.
Here is the patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=572c84d696926132b30060203cd1ab1b16b8fc49
If possible you might cherry-pick to 3-4.
Thank
Hi,
There seems to be a linkage problem when trying to build the vcl
module in master against kde4.
The recipe below looks fine as far as i can see (i.e. all the
essential kde4/qt libs are included):
Invoking recipe from
/home/thuswa/work/tmp/libo/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk:349 to update
target
Hi Markus, *,
Markus Mohrhard wrote (05-06-11 02:04)
I've been looking a bit further into the performance problem when
dealing with several sheets and am now at the move
method.(ScDocument::MoveTab)
With the few sheets that I tend to work with, never even noticed a
progress bar ;-)
But that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|3794|
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedeskt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37942
--- Comment #136 from vitriol 2011-06-0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||3794
--- Comment #135 from vitriol 2011-06-05
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:22:13 +0200
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Alexander,
> My understanding is that libgsf is a Gnome i/o abstraction library used
> for reading/writing structured file formats, and it has several
> extensions, one of which is the thumbnailer which produces thumbnail
Hi all,
Trying to build from master, and the build keeps failing in libgsf
(thumbnailer) to be precise.
The error :
Making all in thumbnailer
CC main.o
CCLD gsf-office-thumbnailer
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gsf-office-thumbnailer.schemas',
needed by `all-am'. Stop.
The line
Thanks.
Jacek
2011/6/4 Christian Lohmaier
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jacek Wolszczak
> wrote:
> >
> > This patch removes dbtoken.hxx in calc/sc which doesn't seem to be used
> > anywhere. At least libreoffice compiles fine after the file is removed.
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
