[Libreoffice] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

The following message to bing...@nkg.pilship.com was undeliverable. The reason for the problem: 5.1.1 - Bad destination email address 'reject' Reporting-MTA: dns; cnc.cn.pilship.com Final-Recipient: rfc822;bing.yu@nkg.pilship.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure) Diagnostic-Code:

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39510

Re: [Libreoffice] building Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows

2011/7/29 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:31 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: On 28 July 2011 15:22, Caolán McNamara

[Libreoffice] fdo#36843 and libadabaslo.so

Hi all, In tracing a reproducible bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36843 on a Debian squeeze box, I stumbled on missing 'libadabaslo.so' while 'libadabasuilo.so' is installed. Because LibO 3.3.2 came with both 'libadabasli.so' and 'libabadasuili.so', I am wondering whether

Re: [Libreoffice] fdo#36843 and libadabaslo.so

Hi, On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:00:45AM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: In tracing a reproducible bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36843 on a Debian squeeze box, I stumbled on missing 'libadabaslo.so' while 'libadabasuilo.so' is installed. Because LibO 3.3.2 came with both

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] report - week #10

Hi there, Short report: I was converting modules to gbuild. Something has been already pushed, something will be next week. Hopefully I did not break too much but it's possible, especially on Windows. Regards, Matus ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] source tarballs: gzip files as .tar.bz2?

Hi, I just hit this: $ file libreoffice-artwork-3.4.2.3.tar.bz2 libreoffice-artwork-3.4.2.3.tar.bz2: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Sat Jul 30 22:28:37 2011 Did I miss something or there seems to be a bug maybe in bin/lo-pack-sources? Thanks. pgpKFRxkkDUfN.pgp Description:

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failed -- Any Ideas?

Hi Swagat, I had such an error before, because I was running make dev-install without running make before. Actually, things have changed a little in the build system now, and we are supposed to run make dev-install only after the first build is done. After that, make does the job. Is that what

Re: [Libreoffice] problems in number format dialog

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote: can someone from the Thai community check whether these two patches cause any problems. We're reading this discussion and patches. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Can developers create add-in for Calc in Libre as we did in OpenOffice?

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Rain Forest rainforest_n...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Rain Forest rainforest_n...@yahoo.com To: Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:38 AM Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Can developers create add-in for Calc

Re: [Libreoffice] Java 7 - not recognised in LO in Windows Vista

+1 There is no point to invest insane amounts of time in weird compatibility voodoo magic for something that will be fixed in 1-2 weeks. Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On 07/30/2011 05:27 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] for Bug 32719

Here is the patch for EasyHack 32719. I have also discovered another bug relating to Impress Templates, documented here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39705 I am submitting this under the LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 license. Thanks, -- --Jeffrey Chang From