Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] - cherrypick to 3.4.3 Base fdo#40079 file / save (as) inoperant

2011-08-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
I'm unsure whether the acks needed for cherrypick are any committer or a more restricted group, but in case it is the former: I agree that commit 03e9161e2eca9d389d7ce419495538c31f6aed31 is worthwhile to cherrypick for 3.4.3, as: 1) Can lead to data loss 2) The fix sounds pretty safe to me (as

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO API reference?

2011-08-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:15:19PM +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote: Is there any way we could have our own api website too? And possibly improve the documentation? Could we do that under a nice license like CC-non commercial? Why non-commercial? The code itself is not limited to

[Libreoffice] build breakage

2011-08-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Lionel, a9b9b40570e6cf26ac23cd49b043d8bc2e878240 at least, break the build You cannot commit code that unconditionally _require_ support for C++0x, so please find a way around that or revert. Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] build breakage

2011-08-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:23:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: a9b9b40570e6cf26ac23cd49b043d8bc2e878240 at least, break the build You cannot commit code that unconditionally _require_ support for C++0x, so please find a way around that or revert. Is using boost/unordered_map OK? --

Re: [Libreoffice] build breakage

2011-08-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:23:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: a9b9b40570e6cf26ac23cd49b043d8bc2e878240 at least, break the build You cannot commit code that unconditionally _require_ support for C++0x, so please

Re: [Libreoffice] Merging old tags

2011-08-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:24:29 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, I just pushed:

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-08-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32849 | ---

Re: [Libreoffice] cppu::OPropertySetHelper ABI backwards compatibility

2011-08-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: 11207ae93191fb966676423e6d377c8292a8cf0b Make XPropertSet2 not a child interface of XPropertySet. This is to preserve ABI backward compatibility with cppu::OPropertySetHelper.

[Libreoffice] slide names in Slide pane Impress

2011-08-21 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Thorsten, I was thinking about this issue https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37654 as a possible easy hack. ( Maybe something that I could take a look at ...?) I expect that the next approach would do: – shrink the slide preview in the slide pane a bit – make sure it is placed a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Enable CUPS unconditionally

2011-08-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, There is still some old (and broken) code to try to print with something else than CUPS on Unix systems. As a first step to clean it, this patch enable CUPS unconditionally -- Francois Tigeot From aed4e0988b1734ec6390665e57441ea3e4257bd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Enable CUPS unconditionally

2011-08-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:53:14PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: -dnl check for cups support -dnl === -AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to enable native cups support]) -if test $test_cups = yes -a z$enable_cups != zno; then -

[Libreoffice] Question about Spec for markers (=line end arrows)

2011-08-21 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, hi Thorsten (I guess, it's your field of work) The spec for markers is in Chapter 16.40.8 of ODF 1.2 part2, page 306. citeMarker geometry is defined by a svg:d attribute. /cite cite The geometry is horizontally centered. It is vertically positioned relative to an offset value which is

Re: [Libreoffice] Tinderbox failure, last success: 2011-08-21 19:36:03

2011-08-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
ok, so I reverted in part that merge-commit. I kept anything that touched wizard/* but reverted everything else... That may or may not correct from a wizard/* point of view, but at least master build again after that Norbert On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com

Re: [Libreoffice] about the removing of binfilter

2011-08-21 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
I think that one good selling point for LO is that it can be the VLC of documents, meaning that it can/should handle anything you throw at it. If we migrate things to an extension, that'd not be a big deal, but then that is like transforming VLC into gstreamer. It requires a tiny bit more work