On 11/30/2011 09:34 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Stephan" == Stephan Bergmann writes:
Stephan> Would -ggdb3 excessively increase object size compared to -ggdb2?
The short answer is yes, but there is a more complicated answer.
First, one must consider the tradeoffs. I always use -g3 when building
Hi all
> So, who would be willing to invest time if it were written in python?
> With C++ at least Markus is already showing interest.
I must admit that i would be more comfortable writing tests in python
than c++
and could then help for some
Laurent
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Windows build is broken once again,
And reverting
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=28275d470f3a062cfa27d72bbf89328af1e83c68
fixes it. I haven't pushed the revert yet since I don't know the
intent of thi
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:12:49PM -0500, August Sodora wrote:
> I always forget [PATCH]
>
> August Sodora
> aug...@gmail.com
> (201) 280-8138
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, August Sodora wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was a little curious about valgrind so I ran it against soffice and
Hi there,
Windows build is broken once again, and this time it fails during
incremental build only.
After a full build succeeds, Doing e.g.
source Env.Host.sh
cd sc
make
fails 100% of the time. It doesn't matter which module you are in, or
which file you touch. It always fails.
However, goi
Hi Caolán,
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 17:47)
I could build like that. But won't be soon, prolly.
Do I just have to give another command, or have to change smthng in an
ini/setting?
additional --enable-symbols to autogen.sh. Need to rebuild at least vcl,
i.e. cd vcl; make -sr clean; make
Regina Henschel wrote (30-11-11 23:23)
It is in share/registry/main.xcd
Thanks Regina!
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:39 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
> Hello,
> sorry, I was sure there was more about it...but too early this morning,
> I could not sort out all points.
>
> > Now you also changed bOnlyDown=false to bOnlyDown=true, which leads to
> > not include newly appended columns
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 01:17 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:22:11PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > So, this suggests that we first write test in python, then later rewrite
> > it in C++, or would python tests stay in python?
>
> It wouldnt scare me if quite a
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:22:11PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> So, this suggests that we first write test in python, then later rewrite
> it in C++, or would python tests stay in python?
It wouldnt scare me if quite a few would not be promoted to C++, so I wouldnt
force people to do rewrite
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 00:15 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:35:33PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Also, by "funky garbage collection" if you are referring to the
> > ref-counted cssu::Reference memory management that UNO API uses (since C
> > ++ doesn't
Hi Kohei,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:35:33PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Also, by "funky garbage collection" if you are referring to the
> ref-counted cssu::Reference memory management that UNO API uses (since C
> ++ doesn't even have memory management natively), doesn't python have
> the same i
Hi Bjoern,
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 23:16 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Oh, I have no opposition against writing C++ tests. When have the
> infrastructure for that in the build system and it certainly has advantages
> once the test is there. However, as Michael pointed out a dynamic language has
On 30/11/11 21:34, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Stephan" == Stephan Bergmann writes:
>
> Stephan> On 11/30/2011 05:37 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Any opinion about this patch? I have it in my local repo, and it helps
>>> me when running under gdb, as gdb now knows about macros!
>
> Stephan> W
Hi Cor,
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Hi,
Up until recently I could change the product-name in the title bar of
the window via this file: share/registry/brand.xcd > prop oooname
Is there another route now?
The least I like to have this for, is that I can easily see in the title
bar, in which of the vari
Hi Kohei,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:20:28PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Let me cast my vote for the use of C++ too. Markus has already outlined
> the benefit of using C++ for debugging point of view.
Oh, I have no opposition against writing C++ tests. When have the
infrastructure for that in
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:47:12AM +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> PS : I haven't managed to build the connector on Mac OSX yet, because
> configure keeps saying it can't find pq_config.
My fault: configure was searching for pg_config, putting the result of
the search in variable PGCONFIG, and
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:21:39PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:34:23PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > >
> > > New commits:
> > > commit 1f538764acdd67c3f294cd03da006ace27f736ef
> > > Author: Bjoern Michae
Hi,
Up until recently I could change the product-name in the title bar of
the window via this file: share/registry/brand.xcd > prop oooname
Is there another route now?
The least I like to have this for, is that I can easily see in the title
bar, in which of the various versions that often
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 19:13 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> >> hmmm i wonder if it would make sense to have UNO API tests written
> >> in Python: that should be much easier on the eyes than boilerplate-heavy
> >> C++/Java... and i think there is a need for tests at the UNO API level
> >> no ma
> "Stephan" == Stephan Bergmann writes:
Stephan> On 11/30/2011 05:37 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Any opinion about this patch? I have it in my local repo, and it helps
>> me when running under gdb, as gdb now knows about macros!
Stephan> Would -ggdb3 excessively increase object size com
On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 05:37 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > Any opinion about this patch? I have it in my local repo, and it helps
> > me when running under gdb, as gdb now knows about macros!
>
> Would -ggdb3 excessively increase object size co
>if you really want to get such obscure things that do not affect most of
>our users investigated, then you should consider getting a support
>contract with one of the companies that have such an offering.
>regards,
>michael
I offer to pay any OOo developer for fixing this issue. If someone mana
Hey,
> Looks very promising. Just one minor comment, I would move away from the
> "unoapi" name (and corresponding qa/unoapi directory). The concept of the
> qadevOOo unoapi tests was to use more-or-less generic code to test all the
> interfaces of all the UNO objects exposed by OOo (so that all
Hey,
>
> IMHO the pragmatic solution to this is to run them as subsequentests when
> dependencies are getting ugly. Writing them in sane C++ is of course better
> that using Junit, but nontrivial tests depending on the full product is not a
> big bug IMHO. I think by now pretty much everyone build
Hi Petr,
2011/11/29 Petr Mladek :
>
> The main purpose of this build is to make sure that we are able to
> create usable builds, with release configuration, from master. The real
> game will start the following week after the feature freeze.
>
>
Does that mean that you configured the builds with
Hey,
thanks a lot for your answers.
2011/11/30 Michael Stahl :
>> - having test files instead of code that fills the cells make it
>> easier to use the test data outside of the test ( e.g. debugging a
>> problem, having a testdocument with known result for some actions)
>
> hmm... am somewhat uns
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:24:19PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 30/11/11 14:59, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > The test itself is a bit ridiculous
>
> so it is a faithful reproduction of the qadevOOo tests :)
One can consider qadevOOo to be fuzzy testing with a minimal intelligence RNG.
> > - d
On 30/11/11 12:10, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Also fixed the misrepresentation of years<1000 with less than 4 digits
we did that? oops. i didn't know that...
> in the file format and enabled reading dates with less than 4 digits in
... so thanks for fixing my importer to match the old broken exporter
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||43384
--- Comment #31 from Rainer Bie
On 30/11/11 14:59, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> after we enabled subsequenttests in sc again we have now a lot of
> failing tests. Instead of debugging the java based tests I plan to
> rewrite them in c++ and fix them during that.
>
> The test itself is a bit ridiculous
so it is a faithful reproduct
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:37:48PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> If nobody opposes, I propose to push it. That option is supported by
> gcc 2.95.3, so should not introduce compatibility issues.
gb_SYMBOL should not introduce full debugging symbols and Rene would likely
strongly object to havi
Thanks for pushing!
I had some "problems" with git (merge conflicts), but I resolved them.
Maybe that was the reason it didn't apply at first.
Thanks also for the tips. I'll switch my translations to U.S. English.
Cheers,
Philipp
On 30 November 2011 10:15, Stefan Knorr (Astron)
wrote:
> Okay, p
On 11/30/2011 05:37 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Any opinion about this patch? I have it in my local repo, and it helps
me when running under gdb, as gdb now knows about macros!
Would -ggdb3 excessively increase object size compared to -ggdb2?
Stephan
_
On 11/30/2011 02:59 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Do you have comments or suggestions?
Looks very promising. Just one minor comment, I would move away from
the "unoapi" name (and corresponding qa/unoapi directory). The concept
of the qadevOOo unoapi tests was to use more-or-less generic code t
Any opinion about this patch? I have it in my local repo, and it helps
me when running under gdb, as gdb now knows about macros!
If nobody opposes, I propose to push it. That option is supported by
gcc 2.95.3, so should not introduce compatibility issues.
--
Lionel
>From 4b28ea46fa6fbd414663d15f
On 11/30/2011 05:13 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
qadevOOo/tests/java/ifc/accessibility/_XAccessibleSelection.java:
log.print("Trying to select child with index " + i + ": ");
Note that much of the stuff testing accessibility in unoapi tests does
not work at all or only unreliably, so has been disa
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:34:23PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > solenv/gbuild/extensions/post_BuildplTargets.mk |2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > New commits:
> > commit 1f538764acdd67c3f294cd03da006ac
I was digging into the new subsequenttests in calc (thanks Stephan),
and wondering why they are -so- infernally slow; during the slowness we
get 2% CPU utilisation - where I'd expect a 50/50 split Java &
soffice.bin - actually the 46/44% split (I would suggest) points to IPC
being the majo
Hello all,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 20:12, Volker Merschmann wrote:
> Is anybody willing to go through the list:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development/Easy_Hacks_Complete_List&offset=2011070100&limit=500&action=history
I have, indirectly though.
I've used WikiBlame
On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> solenv/gbuild/extensions/post_BuildplTargets.mk |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 1f538764acdd67c3f294cd03da006ace27f736ef
> Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
> Date: Wed Nov 30 14:02:08 2011
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:59 +0100, Maxime de Roucy wrote:
> I would like to know if someone (is working|has planed to work)
> on this bug ?
Currently no-one is. But of course we'd love to help you out with some
code pointers if you can put some time into the problem. We don't
estimate tha
Hello
I would like to know if someone (is working|has planed to work) on this
bug ?
Thank you in advance.
--
Maxime de Roucy
Groupe LINAGORA - OSSA
80 rue Roque de Fillol
92800 PUTEAUX
Tel. : 0 810 251 251
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Markus,
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:59 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> after we enabled subsequenttests in sc again we have now a lot of
> failing tests. Instead of debugging the java based tests I plan to
> rewrite them in c++ and fix them during that.
Wow - that's lovely :-)
> I have a
Hey guys,
after we enabled subsequenttests in sc again we have now a lot of
failing tests. Instead of debugging the java based tests I plan to
rewrite them in c++ and fix them during that.
I have attached a first patch that is only porting one part of a
failing test to c++. It would be nice if so
Hi,
2011/11/30 Lionel Elie Mamane :
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:26:00AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:25 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>
Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up
Hi Khaled,
Thanks for your patch ! :-)
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 09:11 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Here is a little patch that fixes a rendering buglet that annoyed me
> since ever. Native GTK applications swap the position of the button and
> editing area of comboboxes in RTL and themese ex
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:54:19PM -0500, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> The Trinity Desktop Project developers are willing to ensure that
> the TDE integration modules continues to function with new TDE
> releases.
For that, I suppose the optimal way would be a
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ account to
Hi Niklas,
On Tuesday, 2011-11-29 09:50:26 +0100, Niklas Johansson wrote:
> >- rList.reset();
> >+ rList.clear();
> >
> >Please check if that fixes the problem.
>
> That fixes the problem, and definitely looks like a cleaner
> solution. Do you create the patch or should I create a new
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:26:00AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:25 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>>> Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up and clarify?
>>> Also please CC yourself o
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:19:21PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 14:23 +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
>>> However, I have no idea how you would enter the strings for a remote db
>>> instance, in particular, the parameter separators.
>> OK, I seem to have figured it out from re
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:25 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up and clarify?
> > Also please CC yourself on the EasyHack you created ;)
>
> still no takers? If
Hi Serg,
On Wednesday, 2011-11-30 16:16:04 +0400, Serg Bormant wrote:
> Surely, I confirm my this and further contributions to LibreOffice
> project are under LGPLv3+ and MPL 1.1.
Great, thanks!
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:15 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
> Okay, pushed with a few modifications. Yay.
Thanks Astron ! :-) great to have you helping out with such merges;
best to have a [PUSHED] in the subject to save others time :-)
Good stuff though,
Mic
Hi Eike, all,
> As this apparently was your first contribution to the actual code base,
> could you please give us a blanket license agreement that this and your
> further contributions are under LGPLv3+ and MPL 1.1
Surely, I confirm my this and further contributions to LibreOffice
project are un
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:25 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up and clarify?
> > Also please CC yourself on the EasyHack you created ;)
>
> still no takers? If nobody CCs h
On 30/11/11 12:27, othman wrote:
> I'm resisting to do debugging for one reason is that i don't know how to
> debug Ooo .
> you are Resisting to ,at least, try the oxt and look to the issue : why ? i
> have no idea.
using non-VCL/UNO dialogs together with LO UI is certainly an "obscure"
use-case,
Hi Othman,
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:27 -0800, othman wrote:
> to come here for LOo experts with deep understanding of LOo code base and
> told myself they will be capable to Support on this difficult issue. But it
> is again disappointment!
It seems you have an unrealistic expectation of
On 2011-11-30 at 10:15 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
> Okay, pushed with a few modifications. Yay.
Just marking the thread as [PUSHED], thank you both! :-)
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
I have been posting this issue in all possible forums since a month or so:
the old OOo forum , the new one , on StackOverflow etc..and lastly i decided
to come here for LOo experts with deep understanding of LOo code base and
told myself they will be capable to Support on this difficult issue. But
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Bug 37361 depends on bug 42914, which changed state.
Bug 42914 Summary: Terminal (command) window is opened when launching any
executable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42914
What|Old Value |New Va
Hi Othman,
othman wrote (30-11-11 11:51)
i gave you the oxt demo , the SWT source code etc..it is you who are not
[...]
There is a grey area ... sometimes it's not always easy for
non-developers to help, provide useful information, on the other hand
devs do give a lot of support to help maki
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Tuesday, 2011-11-29 00:35:46 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > I do not understand why every dates before 1582-10-15 should not be
> > valid when only dates from 1582-10-05 to 1582-10-14 do not exist due to
> > the switch from julian calendar to gregorian calendar.
>
> Well, the
i gave you the oxt demo , the SWT source code etc..it is you who are not
interested (OR DON't KNOW) to fix this issue..
i won't do the debuf stuff sorry..it is the fixer who must debug if he is
interested to look at this issue.
the guy above has at least tried my SWT code and proposed some help..bu
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 02:13 -0800, othman wrote:
> >The best way to get things done is to do them yourself. Feel free to
> >start on that topic if it's really a blocker for you.
> if i knew how to fix it i wouldn't have asked in this forum.
> It's strange when you ask for help for a project people
that's called open-source software:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software
othman wrote:
>> The best way to get things done is to do them yourself. Feel free to
>> start on that topic if it's really a blocker for you.
> if i knew how to fix it i wouldn't have asked in this forum.
> It
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> Le 28/11/2011 11:47, Alexander Thurgood a écrit :
>> However, I have no idea how you would enter the strings for a remote db
>> instance, in particular, the parameter separators. Trawling around the
>> net and in the postgres documen
Hi,
I forgot one important message from Lubos. It is valid even for 3.4.x!
Petr Mladek píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 17:30 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.4.2 tag for 3.4.4-rc2 release.
IMPORTANT: Note for packagers who build with KDE4 integration enabled:
Recent Libre
>The best way to get things done is to do them yourself. Feel free to
>start on that topic if it's really a blocker for you.
if i knew how to fix it i wouldn't have asked in this forum.
It's strange when you ask for help for a project people tell you to do it
yourself! very strange!
--
View this
Hi list,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up and clarify?
> Also please CC yourself on the EasyHack you created ;)
still no takers? If nobody CCs himself in the next days I will kill the
EasyHack status on th
Okay, pushed with a few modifications. Yay.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 42762, which changed state.
Bug 42762 Summary: FILEOPEN particular document with Math Formula object will
CRASH
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42762
What|Old Value |New Val
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 21:36 +0100:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 16:42)
> > Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 15:34 +0100:
> >> Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
>
> >>> Another problem is that we still have only few testcases. We need to
> >>> create more. We still co
Hi Othman,
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 10:48 -0800, othman wrote:
> after i close SWT browser window. i try oepn a new OO document and then OO
> crashes!
> SWT and Libreoffice on linux are very Problematic! they didn't proposed a
> fix to this bug since a very long time now!
The best way to get things
Sorry for saying they didn't apply. They do. My bad.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Philipp,
> More translated comments.
> I used "git format-patch HEAD~2" to generate them. Is that the right
> way? I'm still a git beginner :).
Should be, yes.
Somehow I can't get either to apply to master (fails at lines 216 and
53 respectively), could you please ./g pull -r and see what ha
76 matches
Mail list logo
