I am working on fdo45671 which concerns the use of 'split buttons' for
font/background/border colours, split button meaning that you can either choose
from the colour palette or that you can use the used color.
Presently, the last used colour is stored within the control (mLastColor) and
in the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 18:08 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:39:51PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
> >
> > > looks OK to me. I have cherry-picked it from master, because the
> > > attached patch didn't appl
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
> Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
> needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
> reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
> freeze (I remember the SmartArt import).
Hey,
this patch ([1]) fixes the crash while opening the test document. The
file contains 5 empty categories while we assume that all categories
are non empty which results in a crash in
chart2/source/tools/ExplicitCategoriesProvider.cxx:364
This patch just skips all empty categories. I checked th
Hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt import
Hi,
This is just a small clean-up patch of files that I'm currently working on.
Regarding the translation effort I hope Christina is not working on
these particular files:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks/Translation_Of_Comments
I've put her in copy of this email.
Haven
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Andras Timar
wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0699556c303d724c89b3e9873587c4e9e0d6fe99
>
> Based on http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/credits/
> Please cherry pick to 3-5.
Done.
_
On 20 February 2012 18:26, Riccardo Magliocchetti
wrote:
> gb_Library_set_include is already called few lines above so no need to do it
> again, i think :)
Makes sense, pushed.
Thanks a lot,
Matúš
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedes
Hi Riccardo,
On 20 February 2012 18:43, Riccardo Magliocchetti
wrote:
> define HEADLESS globally as it is meant to be instead of sneaking into
> module specific files.
Thanks for this and your work. Pushed.
Matúš
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffi
Hi,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0699556c303d724c89b3e9873587c4e9e0d6fe99
Based on http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/credits/
Please cherry pick to 3-5.
Thanks,
Andras
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesk
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 18:49 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> Thanks again for the help. Attached a new series of patches (cumulative
> with the previously sent ones and Caolan's), in which (I think) all the
> Java invocations have been removed in favor of using the C++ components:
Attached is
Hi Khoo,
Here's the command line I use on LO root directory :
~/llvm/llvm/tools/clang/tools/scan-build/scan-build make 2>1
1>~/llvm/out/llvm.txt
Hope it helps
Regards,
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-6-0alpha-built-on-clang-tp3758515
On pc Debian x86-64, I've got this kind of errors :
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libo/connectivity/source/drivers/mozab/mozillasrc/MLdapAttributeMap.cxx:51:23:
error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'typeof' with no type [-fpermissive]
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libo/connectivity/source/dr
On 02/20/2012 08:52 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:23 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
WaE: add missing sal and cppunit dependencies causing tinderbox failure
...
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-oc officecfg :TRANSLATIONS:translations soltools solenv LIBXSLT:libxslt
NULL
+oc
Precision : it's fdo#45912
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45912
Connecting to access database using libreoffice's driver: one record missing
I don't know if it's resolved but it could be useful you attach a simple
MsAccess file to the tracker.
Julien.
--
View this message in contex
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:23 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > WaE: add missing sal and cppunit dependencies causing tinderbox failure
...
> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> > -oc officecfg :TRANSLATIONS:translations soltools solenv
> > LIBXSLT:libxslt NULL
> > +oc officecfg :TRANSLATIONS:t
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Pushed to libreoffice-3-5. It does not apply to -3-4 - care to backport
> it?
I take it back, it turns out it was whitespace only - pushed to
libreoffice-3-4 as well.
___
LibreOffice mailin
Hi all,
I would like to know if this bug
http://do-the-right-things.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/faulty-libreoffice-base-ms-access.html
is solved in 3.4.6 I have tried to figure it out by myself with no success.
If it is solved, is it possible to download a nightly build of 3.4.6 from
somewhere?
Hi!
On 18 February 2012 22:29, Petr Vorel wrote:
> I run into troubles while building dictionaries, because I have on my system
> set PERL_UNICODE=SDL (perl script
> clone/dictionaries/dictionaries/util/th_check.pl dies as it's forced to use
> UTF-8, but not all dictionaries are in this encoding)
But which cpu do you have ?
I have a 4-core i7-870.
Best,
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g] Per conto di Noel Grandin
Inviato: lunedì 20 f
Weird, I have a 6-core Windows machine compiling 12 things at once, no problem.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 18:37, walter wrote:
>
> In fact, my problem is that i can't compile using 8 parallel sessions
> because often cl.exe freezes.
>
> Best,
> walter
>
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: libre
Hello,
define HEADLESS globally as it is meant to be instead of sneaking into
module specific files.
thanks,
--
Riccardo Magliocchetti
>From ab6904340fea291e3850f9f8fdedbd4c92a2a3b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Riccardo Magliocchetti
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:39:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] h
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:25:15AM +0100, Michael Stahl
wrote:
> this was apparently not enough, as some of those pesky footnotes are
> quite resistant and hide in unexpected section column frames...
> this additional patch should exterminate the pests more thoroughly and
> should be
Hello,
gb_Library_set_include is already called few lines above so no need to
do it again, i think :)
thanks
--
Riccardo Magliocchetti
>From 70f6e5533b982da0f8dff2fd1399e4aaa1292afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Riccardo Magliocchetti
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:38:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] d
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:24:04AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> I think there are 2 different points :
> 1) to list files in a directory with extension filter
> 2) to open a file with or without extension
> About 2), I agree with the fact we should look at the content and,
> considering your commen
On 20/02/12 17:50, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann
> wrote:
>> [including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
> no problem.
>
>> Does anybody have an idea how to solve this elegantly?
>>
>> One solution might be to undo the mech
Hi Michael,
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 00:19 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> some misc commits, mostly crashes fixed while loading ~2000 presumed
> ODT documents (looking at actual patches reveals expecting people to set
> bug attachment mime types correctly is unrealistic), proposed for
> libreoffice-3-
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:21:30PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> changing the postgresql-sdbc functionality from a bundled extension
> into a proper (optional) part of LO.
> The attached
> 0001-Changed-postgresql-sdbc-from-bundled-oxt-to-proper-o.patch
> (against recent libreoffice-3-5) does j
LibreOffice build succesfully finished.
It took 3 hours on a non-dedicated machine.
Best,
walter
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g] Per conto di walter
Inviato:
Hi Cor,
On 2012-02-20 at 17:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Anyhow - I don't see a special case for bending the rules of triple
> > reviews, nor a reason to refuse it if it gets that widespread
> > support :-) it's a nice fix.
>
> Thanks, that sounds encouraging.
> As written: going for 3.5.2
On 20 February 2012 16:07, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I poked Fridrich, the oracle on this sort of thing - wrt. our old
> build-systems. On windows we have perl 5.10 but on Linux 5.8.8 ( we have
> an artificially old Linux machine to produce forward-compatible builds).
There are some nice thin
All my contributions will be licensed under MPL/LGPLv3+.
Wei Ming
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> [including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
no problem.
> Does anybody have an idea how to solve this elegantly?
>
> One solution might be to undo the mechanism by which a cxx only needed in
> subsequentcheck is
Attached patch addresses the first fix for fdo45671, the rest will follow one
by one.
This patch is a bit more elaborate than I expect the rest to be as I prepared
the code
for the patches to follow, i.e. for the split buttons that I will be adding.
I have renamed class SvxFontColorExtToolBoxCo
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 09:41 +, Khoo Wei Ming wrote:
> clang flags this as
Nice research, E-mail & patch, pushed :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffic
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:13)
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least)
In fact, my problem is that i can't compile using 8 parallel sessions
because often cl.exe freezes.
Best,
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g
> Not the last time I benchmarked it (which was long before
> filter-showIncludes.pl). For the most part the slowness of forking on windows
> was related to some latency, i.e. a new process would take some time to get
> started, but it wouldnt eat cycles for that, thus making it irrelevant in a
> p
Hi there,
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 17:59 +, Khoo Wei Ming wrote:
> A big kudos to Kristian Rietveld for his hard work described here
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Building_LibreOffice_with_Clang
Indeed :-)
> So for what it's worth, here's the route I took (by no means
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> And the slowness of Cygwin's forking and executing the various Perl,
> shell and whatnot processes involved in each file being compiled (note
> the pipe to filter-showIncludes.pl) has nothing to do with it?
Not the last time I
Yes, indeed, i have taken a huge blindness !!
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
> cpu power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a four-core,
hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's point of view)?
What is 100 di
On 02/18/2012 04:29 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
officecfg/prj/build.lst |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 8c67428341d42ada42f9186bbfe3d6f25a0edaef
Author: Michael Meeks
Date: Sat Feb 18 15:28:35 2012 +
WaE: add missing sal and cppunit depend
[including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
officecfg/CppunitTest_officecfg_cppheader_test.mk requires
officecfg/qa/cppheader.cxx, which indirectly includes headers from
higher up the module hierarchy; plain "make" build logs show that the
cxx is needlessly compiled, c
Hi Michael, *,
> Thanks for that ! :-) are you tempted by any of the Easy Hacks ?
I will try them (and ask for some help) when I am more familiar with
the code base.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS P
Hi Cor,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
> >> Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
> >> The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
> >> least).
:-) it is some
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:05)
Having a well formed, and reproducible bug report would be rather
useful :-)
Yes, I think we realise that :-)
Therefore I added some comments on how I can reliably reproduce (more
opening the doc and doing some random work for some tim
Hi Tim,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 13:47 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> $ corelist File::Spec
Nice :-)
> Which leads to the question: what is the minimum version of Perl we
> can rely on in LibreOffice? Currently configure.in checks for Perl 5,
I poked Fridrich, the oracle on this s
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:27 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> thanks for picking this one up.
> Now with 3.5 out in the wild, reports of people loosing data appear. I
> would like to propose this issue as *blocker* for 3.5.1 .. nothing less.
Having a well formed, and reproducible bug report woul
> Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
> converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintained them?
Manually maintained.
I started using cmake but it had to be discarded for some reason.
Unfortunately I don't remember why, but it was a long time ago so it
may not be
Andreas Radke píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 18:23 +0100:
> My ArchLinux installation makes use of the file-list/*.txt files to
> split our packages. That way the postgresql-sdbc stuff is missing in
> our installation. I guess they should be added to the base or common
> file list.
The file-list/*.txt f
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
> power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a
four-core, hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's
point of view)?
What is 100 divided by 8?
--tml
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:25 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes another 16 unused methods.
Thanks for that ! :-) are you tempted by any of the Easy Hacks ?
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_
In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
power.
I think that this problem must be analyzed.
Best,
walter
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a
> cpu core to the limit.
M
On 18 February 2012 09:43, jumbo444 wrote:
> Actually all use of PRODUCT was removed from the code (if I correctly
> greped). However it may also be necessary to remove the definition of
> PRODUCT. I was not able to understand clearly how it is defined. I found
> some PRODUCT="" or PRODUCT="full"
> I think that is oversimplifying things quite a bit.
Well, what isn't? Excuse me for writing quick emails without spending
a week researching first.
> While there are some
> stability issues with cygwin
"some" stability issues?
> when combined with evil Windows necessities like
> in-memory-vir
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
> core to the limit.
My experience is the opposite; I occasionally see a cl.exe taking over
25% CPU on a four-core system (not HT)... Might of course just be
rounding errors; in any case for compilations taking a long tim
Hi Andrew, *,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (20-02-12 12:59)
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Have been poking around the LO code today trying to decide where I
might put break points to help in tracking this. Looks like this
occurs (for my sample) when auto-save kicks in, so I may place a
break point
Hi all,
I hereby declare that my past and future contributions to LibreOffice are
licensed under the LGPL v3+ and the MPL v1.1.
Best wishes,
Gert van Valkenhoef
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.or
I think there are 2 different points :
1) to list files in a directory with extension filter
2) to open a file with or without extension
About 2), I agree with the fact we should look at the content and,
considering your comment
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c5, it should be o
On 20.02.2012 19:12, Noel Grandin wrote:
The error was sourced several levels down in the boost stuff, and the
originating point was everywhere I tried to assign into ptr_map.
I think it had something to with the copyability of the Font class.
Did you try to use 'insert(key, value)' instead of
Hi *
About windows / Cygwin performance.
I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
core to the limit.
The best that the cl.exe can is 13% cpu usage without any I/O activity.
Where is the time spent ?
Any Idea ?
I have a i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz, HT enabled.
Best,
Walter
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 16:38, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
>
> What line produces that error? I suppose we should do use ptr_map, because
> even you forgot to delete object :)
The error was sourced several levels down in the boost stuff, and the
originating point was everywhere I tried to a
Hi,
On Monday, 2012-02-20 13:42:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
>
> Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
> makefiles (or sc
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:06:37PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> The main problem in building LibreOffice for Windows on Windows
> currently is that the *open source* stuff used in the build, i.e.
> Cygwin, is slow and causes random errors. The Microsoft compiler and
> linker work fine. If the
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 18:49 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> Thanks again for the help. Attached a new series of patches (cumulative
> with the previously sent ones and Caolan's), in which (I think) all the
> Java invocations have been removed in favor of using the C++ components:
>
> 1) Im
Hi Noel,
On 14.02.2012 15:25, Noel Grandin wrote:
Note that I tried converting these usages to boost::ptr_map, but I ran
into entirely undecipherable C++ template errors.
Sorry for the late review... :(
What line produces that error? I suppose we should do use ptr_map,
because even you forgo
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:07 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/commit/?id=312a744c1c8a4afce0fe06a4423d97ebb883fc6d
>
> Please cherry-pick to 3-5.
done
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fre
Hi Kendy, *,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (14-02-12 14:47)
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least).
The problem is that it is partially a feature,
Hi Caolán,
On Monday, 2012-02-20 13:27:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> +1 on review, but they conflict horribly in multiple places on 3-4 and
> 3-5. I suggest you fix them up and push them yourself with my signoff
The joy of having properly indented the files on master ... thanks for
trying ;
Stephan Bergmann píše v Po 20. 02. 2012 v 13:42 +0100:
> On 02/16/2012 01:49 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > This is not really my sphere of expertise, so review appreciated.
> > Rather than clobber the DesktopContext with some out-of band magic
> > (which creates the JavaInteractionHandler that i
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:50 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:00:31PM +, ke...@suse.cz wrote:
> [...]
> > d40a7f1 make gengal work again
>
> is the breaking one.
>
> > [ info ALL ] Currently known executables: bestreversemap bmp bmpsum
> > cppunit/cppunittester cr
On 20 February 2012 11:30, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:39 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> Great :-) thanks for that, it's always nice to use standard methods
> instead of custom / hand-coded ones. Clearly we want to introduce new
> perl dependencies on shared modules only wit
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
makefiles (or script or whatever they are) to build it with express 2008
under windows, so it
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:31 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> It fails in testtools/source/bridgetest/
And removing the unxlng* in testtools are forcing a rebuild there
doesn't help ?, i.e. this might be an unrelated thing with a partial
rebuild with missing dependency information in the old dmake-based
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 14:48 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and cherry-pick to 3-5 and 3-4
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5d6af4f2947432a55324e4f5cc67bca202f939e9
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=4e0928278df9e327dac9ac4d0ebf40bf
Hi,
This patch removes another 16 unused methods.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org
Email: el...@layerjet.com
-
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:49:02AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote
>> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:49 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
>>> I let a comment about this bug
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
>>> I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean
On 02/16/2012 01:49 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
This is not really my sphere of expertise, so review appreciated.
Rather than clobber the DesktopContext with some out-of band magic
(which creates the JavaInteractionHandler that in the end complains). I
thought I'd just give this guy a nil co
Hi Jesus, Tor, *,
> It can be done, yes. But it requires several months of work from
> someone who knows what is doing and the result would probably be a
> nightmare to maintain.
Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintai
Hi,
Would it be possible to have a Windows tinderbox build a private
branch of mine? It would roughly be libreoffice-3-5 plus most of my
commits to master.
As far as the LibreOffice project is concerned, this would allow me to
dogfood the changes I do to master in production => a better Base in
3
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:33 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 14 unused methods from basegfx.
Pushed; thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing l
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for the update on this poll.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:08, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Dear members,
>
> the poll for the LibreOffice 2012 conference closed last night. You
> can review the full ballot here:
>
> https://elections.documentfoundation.org/votes.php?election_id=2
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 18:42 +0100, Mariusz Dykierek wrote:
> Performance improvement unlikely yet readability/intent clearer + cppcheck
> satisfied.
Found pushed :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
> Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
> goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any
> way by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Bah. I don't agree with that.
After all, we are talking about building software to run on a
Mi
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> Have been poking around the LO code today trying to decide where I
> might put break points to help in tracking this. Looks like this
> occurs (for my sample) when auto-save kicks in, so I may place a
> break point in the auto save code and then start stepping thro
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 19:04 +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
Pushed, thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreO
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 01:13 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> another bit of unused core removed.
Thanks for that, pushed :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Lib
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
>
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:49 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
>> I let a comment about this bug
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
>> I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean variables
>> quoted in the comment.
>
> Does Lionel's
Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any way
by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Best regards
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab.
> AFAIK that was a pure community effort and not backed by Sun/Oracle.
I meant that Sun/Oracle was behind OpenOffice.org.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OpenOffice.org, at least back when Sun/Oracle still was behind it, had
> a few (?) people working on using MinGW on Windows. We are not
> interested in that. Correspondingly they had not worked on
> cross-compilation (to any platform)
> But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
> MS compiler?
Yes. But that is not used *on* Windows. The subject of this thread is
"Building LibreOffice *on* Windows".
MinGW (the commonly used name for the GNU compiler and tool-chain when
targeting Windows) is supp
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:39 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> These three patches remove some home-grown path manipulation from
> solenv, and replace it with functions shipped with the Perl core.
Great :-) thanks for that, it's always nice to use standard methods
instead of custom / hand
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #191 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-02-20 03:28:27 PST ---
mentioned above bug 46144 is regression since version 3.4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
MS compiler?
Best Regards
walter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 11:25 +0100, Xuacu Saturio wrote:
> I was about to start working in Asturian Lightproof checker when I was
> told our Asturian spellchecker people were working in languagetool.
:-)
> Please, can you tell us which is/will be the default grammar checker
> (if any)?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:44:50AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> > Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> > solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> > cmake style perhaps?
>
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 14:23 +0100, walter wrote:
> Please see logs AT http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
Could it be that your translation/ repository is still on 'master' but
your core/ repository is on libreoffice-3-5 ? If so you'd want to do:
./g checkout libreoffice-3-5
On 20/02/12 11:28, walter wrote:
> Now, after a full re-clone, I have a build error in 'reportbuilder'.
> Please see logs http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
looking at the log it seems like you have a --with-lang setting and for
none of the languages you have enabled there is a translation of the
desc
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.1-rc1 is today, February 20, 2012.
The branch libreoffice-3-5-1 is going to be created the day after. Only
commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch.
See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
http://wiki.do
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
