Hi all,
(Sorry for the noise on the list), this message is just to mention that all of
my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the
MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license.
Cheers,
Camille
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.f
Dear LibO devs,
Some quite strategical fixes for autofilters have landed in OOo in CWS
calc66 thanks to IBM team:
Issue 89232 Fill operations should not touch filtered rows.
Issue 85305 Dynamically grow a filtered range for autofilter
Any chance to get that soon in LibO?
Thanks,
Camill
On 07/03/2011 20:12, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>> A question coming from end-users : is there somebody who works or plan
>> to work on improving Flash export in Impress, especially export of
>> transitions ?
>>
> No-one actively working on that currently, though we'd love
On 02/03/2011 22:11, Frode Severin Hatlevik wrote:
[...]
> Have anyone else experienced a similar situation? Does this qualify
> for a bug report?
Are you refering to
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105283
?
I haven't fully tested, but I think it's fixed in LibO
Hi All,
Any chance that someone could have a look at that?
Thanks,
Camille
On 10/12/2010 23:10, camille wrote:
> Dear LibO devs,
>
> Please find attached a tentative patch for my own Easy Hack described
> below.
>
> The problem :
>
> Default color for native tables in Impress is blue. Most p
On 14/11/2010 18:11, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> 2010-11-14 17:35 keltezéssel, Sebastian Spaeth írta:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:19 +, Michael Meeks
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, a
[Sorry for the empty mail]
On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - "camille moulin" a écrit :
>> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
[...]
>>> - to attach a
>>> debugger to soffice in this 20 second window
>> I'll
On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - "camille moulin" a écrit :
>> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
> [...]
>>> It would be just great (if you can reproduce this)
>> I can reproduce this no problem
>
> Strang
- "camille moulin" a écrit :
> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
[...]
> > It would be just great (if you can reproduce this)
> I can reproduce this no problem
Strangely, since I install windbg files now open normally, but closing still
takes 30 seconds.
Hi Michael,
- "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
> Hi Camille,
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:24 +0200, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110878
>
> The more detailed duplicate report is:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
- "Sebastian Spaeth" a écrit :
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:25:27 +0200 (CEST), camille.mou...@free.fr
> wrote:
>
> Not knowing anything about that issue, can you sniff the traffic to
> port
> 80?
Not at the moment.
> What is it trying to do?
According to
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/s
Dear LibO devs,
A little x-post (sorry) in case some of yous don't read ooo-dev.
I haven't tested it yet with LibO, but I'm afraid it misbehaves the same way. (
I would be delighted to be wrong, though)
I think the issue is quite serious and might be a real blocker for corporate
deployment.
"
Hi Michael,*
- "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
[...]
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:54 +0200, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
[...]
> > I have started formalizing my
> > arguments in favour of this change there :
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Camillem/aboutFramework#Read_Only_files_sh
- "Kohei Yoshida" a écrit :
[...]
> No disagreement there. I would be among the first ones to support
> removal of this cruft.
Great :-)
>
> Having said that, once we remove this, it won't be easy to add it
> back.
> So I'd personally like to be a bit careful on making decision here.
I
- "Laurent Godard" a écrit :
> Hi
>
> > Is it intentional that if you open a read-only document (for
> example
> > from a browser), then you can't edit it (can't delete sheets for
> > example), but the icon is still there and you can add new sheets?
> :)
Well, I guess it's not consistent w
15 matches
Mail list logo
