the Layout class has some virtual methods with no implementation, this
sounds like these need to be pure virtual making Layout an abstract class (
which makes sense ) When I looked a little close at some of those methods I
notice
IMO, not all empty virtual functions need to be pure virtual.
Sorry, but I forgot to compile before patching.
Please, push this fix too.
Uray M. János
2012/8/7 Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi
Thanks, puxhed.
--tml
From aef47b5e204067ae406eca664a504155cc699ef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Uray=20M.=20J=C3=A1nos?= uray.ja...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Code_Conventions#Vetoed_Conventionssays
that C++ RTTI is preferred over tools/rtti.hxx.
In my opinion, the best would be not using casts at all (using e.g. virtual
functions instead).
Uray M. János
2012/8/7 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com
On
For me, it doesn't crash, so I've no idea how to fix it.
I don't understand this DELETEZ thing... DELETEZ deletes than zeros a
pointer. This is now done automatically by boost::shared_ptr::~shared_ptr().
Uray M. János
Nice work! :) I wanted to push this, but it seems it causes a crash here
when
The patch solves this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42492
There was a buffer overflow: char aBuffer[16] had no room for the
terminating null character.
But the hex command was still wrong, because the printf used %X and
%lX, which are very platform-dependent.
Actually the
Again? Oh, yes.
Now here it is.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Noel Power nopo...@suse.com wrote:
Hi János
you forgot to attach the patch :-)
On 30/07/12 19:04, János Uray wrote:
This patch solves this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47907
The text was flickering
://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/47zceaw7%28v=vs.110%29
Uray M. János
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Noel Power nopo...@suse.com wrote:
On 31/07/12 07:13, János Uray wrote:
The patch solves this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/**
show_bug.cgi?id=42492https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id
I also like to avoid C-style string handling, but valueOf() doesn't support
unsigned integers (it should support all C++ integer types), and converting
to sal_Int64 didn't come into my mind.
Why did you extend the comment: // converting value to unsigned *and limit
to 2 or 4 byte representation*?
This patch indends to solve this bug:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46968
The undo just assigned to SdrTextObj::aRect its previous value. Now it
calls NbcSetLogicRect() for this task. This function calls -- among others
-- NbcSetMinTextFrameHeight(), which is neccessary to avoid
This patch solves this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47907
The text was flickering because Window::Invalidate() clears the client area
by default. To prevent this, I've added an INVALIDATE_NOERASE parameter to
Invalidate() calls.
On the other hand, the background still needed
This patch solves https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40152 .
Uray M. János
From d10f4ddea22d332fee1a642d076bbce25ac4b10a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Uray=20M.=20J=C3=A1nos?= uray.ja...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:42:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fdo#40152 replace with
It still works for me. Am I doing something wrong?
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Noel Power nopo...@suse.com wrote:
On 25/07/12 08:48, János Uray wrote:
This patch solves
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/**show_bug.cgi?id=40152https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40152.
weirdly
In Basic IDE, Replace all said Search key replaced times, so without
the number.
This patch fixes it. (The nFound was treated as a character instead of an
integer.)
Uray M. János
From e6266f1374ccb193314dcb8ac882897b2b5150a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Uray=20M.=20J=C3=A1nos?=
This patch fixed this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50632
The Object Catalog was not updated, because at the point when
onDocumentClosed() event was generated in BasicTreeListBox, the to-be-closed
document is still alive, so UpdateEntries() doesn't remove the entry. I
removed
This patch solves this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
Uray M. János
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Oh, yes, I'm sorry.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com wrote:
I think you forgot to attach it.
On 2012-07-24 11:31, János Uray wrote:
This patch solves this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
Uray M. János
Oh, yes, I'm sorry.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
detective.conan.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:31 PM, János Uray uray.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch solves this bug:
Seems you forgot to attach the patch? :-)
Bets Regards
This patch fixes this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52223
From ef69583b67ff9f34e615b3595984090515dec501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Uray=20M.=20J=C3=A1nos?= uray.ja...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:48:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fdo#52223 fix Object Catalog in
Thank you again.
Unfortunately gcc starts to support C++11 only in 4.3, and MSVC has very
little C++11 in 2008 (2010 has much more).
Uray M. János
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:35 PM, János Uray uray.ja...@gmail.com
License statement
All my current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project
are done under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
Until further notice, all my future contributions to the LibreOffice
project are available under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
Uray M. János
I have a simple question.
Can I use C++11 in LibreOffice development? Or at least some parts of C++11?
Thanks
Uray M. János
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
21 matches
Mail list logo
