On 10 February 2013 09:54, Nadav Vinik nadav...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2013 22:45, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/02/13 20:13, Nadav Vinik wrote:
ubuntu 12.10
$ make accessibility
Makefile:76: [WARN ] !!![WARN ] !!! The following modules claim to be
both
ubuntu 12.10
$ make accessibility
Makefile:76: [WARN ] !!![WARN ] !!! The following modules claim to be
both dmake and gbuild: *[WARN ] !!!
Makefile:139: warning: overriding commands for target `aclocal.m4'
Makefile:137: warning: ignoring old commands for target `aclocal.m4'
Makefile:139:
On 9 February 2013 22:45, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/02/13 20:13, Nadav Vinik wrote:
ubuntu 12.10
$ make accessibility
Makefile:76: [WARN ] !!![WARN ] !!! The following modules claim to be
both dmake and gbuild: *[WARN ] !!!
=
(1/1) Building
I saw that LO 3.3 released:
http://www.libreoffice.org/download
As the first stable version of LO, why there aren't any PR?
even the home page don't mention it.
thanks
Nadav
--
הבלוג שלי:
http://nadavvin.com
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Behrens tbehr...@novell.com wrote:
Nadav Vinik wrote:
hm, any chance you could (privately) send the problematic file? I
currently fail to get where that warning comes from - it's apparently
coming from libwmf, which we're not using - funny.
I don't know if I can, It's spec file in my work
Making:all_mig.dpslo
Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx
/home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44:
error: no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'
member function declared in class 'desktop::Migration'
dmake:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
Making: all_mig.dpslo
Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx
/home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215
/make_installer.pl
line 53.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/solenv/bin/make_installer.pl
line 53.
Failed to install: at solenv/bin/ooinstall line 96.
Failed to ooinstall at bin/ooinstall line 72.
thanks
Nadav
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Nadav Vinik
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Cedric Bosdonnat
cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:26 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
New iteration of http://libreoffice.org/credits.html in case you want to
show your name on that page to your grandmothers.
Anything else that you
Hello
Currently I edit the code in the clone dir and then use meld to copy
the changes to build/libreoffice*
Where should I edit the code?
When the build copy the changes from the clone?
Why the make don't use the clone directory instead of the need to
duplicate the code to the build directory?
Notice that I leave:
#if defined LINUX !defined NOPAM
#else
Since If I remove those lines, It's complain about #endif without #if
Nadav
--
הבלוג שלי:
http://nadavvin.com
diff --git a/sal/osl/unx/security.c b/sal/osl/unx/security.c
index 92bc432..0d775b9 100644
--- a/sal/osl/unx/security.c
--
הבלוג שלי:
http://nadavvin.com
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index f3151a7..f21bda9 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -713,14 +713,10 @@ if test z$with_java = zno; then
fi
fi
-AC_CHECK_HEADER(security/pam_appl.h, have_pam=true, have_pam=false)
Hello
I have docx document that LO failed load is images.
The image can added to document, altough the XML code is defer.
this is the part of the document.xml of the image.
Do you know if it's because LO can't parse this part? (for any
tag/property for example)
I still investigate the
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Nadav Vinik em...@nadavvin.com wrote:
Hello
I have docx document that LO failed load is images.
The image can added to document, altough the XML code is defer.
this is the part of the document.xml of the image.
Do you know if it's because LO can't parse
remove pam in writer sw
diff --git a/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx
b/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx
index db72a3c..708ab29 100644
--- a/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
#include editeng/fontitem.hxx
#include
Hello
If I change something in the clone dir and the compilation failed and
it complain about something in builld/build/libreoffice-* folder,
How can I find the same in the clone dir?
Thanks
Nadav
--
הבלוג שלי:
http://nadavvin.com
___
LibreOffice
Hello
Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes.
Are there more full time developers?
Are there more companies that donate developers for that?
Are the releases of the LO depend on Oracle Open Office like LO? (since also
LO is open office version with git of patch differences)
17 matches
Mail list logo