[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-3-7' - external/openssl

external/openssl/UnpackedTarball_openssl.mk |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 199891f4ee16bc175727552fc7971c60b3c9a303 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Apr 11 13:53:17 2015 -0500 openssl build breakage on MacOSX 10.6

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-3-7' - extensions/source

extensions/source/bibliography/datman.cxx |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit aba01a8c4cc1fbd9d4a3bf2b8bbf6582a17e9414 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Apr 11 13:17:03 2015 -0500 some compiler do not like >> but prefer > > in tem

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-3' - external/openssl

external/openssl/UnpackedTarball_openssl.mk |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 75ea06ea2366cdde73861be0b14ff2fc959ea03a Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Apr 11 13:53:17 2015 -0500 openssl build breakage on MacOSX 10.6

Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for LibreOffice

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > Im a bit confused by coveritys output here recently: > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 03:32:48AM -0700, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote: >> 4 new defect(s) introduced to LibreOffice found with Coverity Scan. >> [...] >> New defect(s) Re

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/qa

sc/qa/extras/new_cond_format.cxx |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit 61f1f6b4d65621d5c02e0c971c6ed51f6711fb63 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Mon Mar 30 10:41:59 2015 -0500 WaE clang seems confused with >>= overriden operator and

Re: How many degrees of headlessness do we need?

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > On Windows and OS X, > --headless support is presumably broken to some degree. On Mac we have the env variable VCL_HIDE_WINDOWS connected to 'PseudoHeadless' the poor man version of headless achieved my preventing any Windows of 'showing' I

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: solenv/gbuild

solenv/gbuild/Module.mk | 16 solenv/gbuild/gbuild.mk |2 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) New commits: commit 0db89bcabfb4e207bed95b4a14685391311eaa3e Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Mar 28 23:24:05 2015 -0500 make gbuild a bit more quiet by

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

configure.ac | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) New commits: commit 67d1fd3b627a2223034d8f0cedad6bfb7774095a Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Mar 28 11:58:22 2015 -0500 make --enable-pch the default on windows Using precompiled header have

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/vcl sw/source vcl/generic vcl/inc vcl/source

-- vcl/source/gdi/sallayout.cxx| 10 - vcl/source/outdev/text.cxx | 53 ++--- 13 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3c6fd5a59b08cec8705a31d17a60204acf6b7173 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Mar 28 20:38:22 2015

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > * Tinderbox functionality stats (Norbert) > + what %age of time is green for each platform ? Here are the precise stats for the past 2 weeks: Job name#-Successful#-Failed#-Total Builds-Failure Rate lo_gerrit_master-101-140-241-58.09%

Re: 4.4.3.0.0+ build fails (unit tests)

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:32:35PM +0300, Justin Luth > wrote: >> P.S. I have not been able to figure out how to remove a file from a >> commit if I add it accidentally. If I do a "git commit -a" and get an >> unintended fil

Re: Run buildbot on a feature branch?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Zolnai Tamás wrote: > Hi there, > > I just wonder whether there is a way to run a buildbot / tinderbox on > a specific feature branch. It would be helpful before merge one to > master. all you have to do is to push a change for that feature branch via gerrit, ins

Re: git push: access denied.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Winfried Donkers wrote: > Hi Qiwen Gao, > >>$ ./logerrit test >>Your gerrit setup was successful! >>$ git push origin pathc:refs/for/master >>fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: /core > > If you use > ./logerrit submit > instead of git pu

Re: General Google OpenID warning on commit? (was: LibreOffice ESC call, Thur March 6th - 16:00 central European (local) time)

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > on todays ESC call we discussed google ending its OpenID support with a hard > deadline on April: > > http://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/esc wrote: >> + make sure to create a new openid if you are using the Google openID >> (

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

FYI: things that are known to work and already used by our gerrit users are: launchpad, fedora, Yahoo, verisign Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Make.exe for Cygwin

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: > ++Norbert > >> awesome! > > Thanks. The root cause is that stat is not precise enough, not the FS > timestamp precision (I should have redacted that). > >> >> that sounds like a reasonable approach for platforms where hi-res stat >> is curr

Re: Bad Jenkins Slave?

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: >>> TB57[1] was idle when it failed to mkdirs during build #873 [2]. Error >>> belo

Re: Bad Jenkins Slave?

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 02:02:07PM +, Wols Lists wrote: > >> Mmmm ... so Unix that lets you delete files under a running process, >> causing a crash, is any better? > > No, it doesn't. It just lets you remove one of the file's names

Re: Bad Jenkins Slave?

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 22/02/15 05:50, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> PS: Windows 2012 somehow ended-up with a 'ghost' directory that no-one >> could delete not even Admin ( Windows these days is so secure than >> even Administrator

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Luc Castermans wrote: > hi, following this thread I am really bit lost now. Should I get another > OpenID account and > assure I can access gerrit? YES Waiting is not option, right? NO ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: Bad Jenkins Slave?

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: > TB57[1] was idle when it failed to mkdirs during build #873 [2]. Error > below. > > > Anyone able and inclined enough to take a look? Thanks. Should be fixed now. PS: Windows 2012 somehow ended-up with a 'ghost' directory that no-one coul

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:28 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > > Unfortunately, as with my experience with the StackExchange OpenID, I really > don't think the cut over will be "seamless or uneventful" for LO project. > > @David Os., Norbert--did I get that right? Any additional comments? Pretty much.

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

FYI: to date 698 accounts in gerrit have only google as OpenId provider out of 874 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Google OpenId is going to turn off by April 20... A very large portion of hte gerrit users have google are their sole openid provider linked to their account. You need to link one or more other OpenId provider to your existing account. See: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GoogleOpen

Re: Make under win7 breaks

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Juergen Funk Mailinglist wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthieb...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Februar 2015 05:08 > An: Juergen Funk Mailinglist > Cc: libreoffice-dev > Betr

Re: Make under win7 breaks

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Juergen Funk Mailinglist wrote: > What is or where is my mistake? I'm assuming that you are building with cygwin-make... try the windows-native gmake: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows#Install_GNU_make (make sure to re-run autogen

Re: broken --enable-tde (was: Tinderbox failure, Linux-Ubuntu-x86_64@54-TDE, MASTER, last success: 2015-02-12 12:15:08)

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Somebody who cares for that TDE integration should put some love into this. isn't TDE an emphemism for KDE3 ? maybe that should be forwarded to the guy that maintain OS/2 ? >:-> Norbert ___

Re: GSoC 2015 (Building the code on OS X)

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Vlad Shablinsky wrote: > Hi, I'm Vlad Shablinksy. I'm studying Computer Science at Belarusian State > University. > I would really like to work with LibreOffice this summer. I've been trying > to build the code on OS X 10.10.2 (Minimal Setup) and I've encountered t

Re: broken windows build

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Maybe the tooling's output can be improved so that it becomes more apparent > in that what > actually happened was that "make" was killed upon a timeout. timing out from the

broken windows build

since most likely http://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_tb_master_win/506/ one of the four patches involved there seems to cause the windows build to break and enter a cpu-loop in make, which cause a timeout... which does not apparently properly kill make, and therefore the tcp-server is hung too and c

Re: Author attribution of a patch

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Stanislav Horáček wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a help patch containing examples for DBCS functions as > suggested by Jesper Hertel on the l10n mailing list [1]. In Gerrit review, I > was advised to state his authorship [2], however I was not replied how to do > it

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-4' - connectivity/source

connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabResultSet.cxx |5 + connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabStatement.cxx |2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 35892dfbbc1779306e11d2ea87c5aaead43356d2 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Tue Feb 3 16:12:50

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-3' - connectivity/source

connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabResultSet.cxx |5 + connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabStatement.cxx |2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 954840d55ede990b368c5314bdb876ced56cfbe2 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Tue Feb 3 16:12:50

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: connectivity/source

connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabResultSet.cxx |5 + connectivity/source/drivers/macab/MacabStatement.cxx |2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 90c3e6905daefad3d57c14090cd30a0d280ec989 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Tue Feb 3 16:12:50

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: writerfilter/source

writerfilter/source/ooxml/factoryimpl.py |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit a33f4060a4baa16eac5d997187764270e93cb6dd Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Mon Feb 2 18:46:13 2015 +0100 WaE: unused variable Change-Id

Re: Build failure in 4.4 branch with --enable-ext-google-docs on Xubuntu 14.04 amd64: "undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'"

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 05:16:14PM +0100, Alexander Thurgood > wrote: >> Thanks, but that page references x86 builds for MacOSX and not x86_64. >> Is it still applicable for our 64bit OSX releases ? > > Norbert, am I right that just a simpl

Re: Build failure in 4.4 branch with --enable-ext-google-docs on Xubuntu 14.04 amd64: "undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'"

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 26/01/2015 10:49, Miklos Vajna a écrit : > > Hi Miklos, >> >> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ReleaseBuilds documents >> that the gdrive flags are also used for TDF builds, so they are >> available for the general pub

Re: Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:40:33AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 26.01.2015 09:57, Miklos Vajna wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane >>> wrote: > Is there some way to get the compilation resu

Re: 4.4.0.1 build error on sal/types.h on solaris/illumos

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Ok, I checked and it looks fine, so solaris.mk should be taken. > Also config.log shows correct variables for OS, CPU and COM. > > What actually happens is during make, after it has downloaded and extracted > various stuff. > The last one

Re: 4.4.0.1 build error on sal/types.h on solaris/illumos

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Looks like 4.4.0.2 has this solaris ld patch already applied. > I strongly believe gmake is not using the solaris.mk file. > How can I verify if configure/make is really taking the solaris.mk platform? In gbuild.mk we include platform/$(O

Re: Clean up OSL_ASSERT, DBG_ASSERT, etc.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: > > Do we not have C code? For all intent and purpose.. no. not enought to worry about it > Also, we might have to support a non-conforming > compiler in some port (at a future date). the lack of static_assert would be the least of your pr

Re: enabling optimizations (-Og) with --enable-debug

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/15/2015 10:47 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: >> >> It probably is, but with some caveats. My main concern would be >> unnecessary code pollution. It's true that these warnings could be >> really useful. They might hint at actual issues i

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 0a911d9a6b72f656ea2780d4a8e35f2b9c3d52c8 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Thu Jan 15 08:33:51 2015 -0600 do not _override_ werror even if LODE_HOME is present Change-Id

--enable-werror by default on Jenkins build

By popular demand --enable-werror is now the default for jenkins controlled build since bb79f1ef25887190f63abbbe24bc9900807f7613 I would be useful if tb owner were to enable it to maximize early issue detection Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libre

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

configure.ac |7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit bb79f1ef25887190f63abbbe24bc9900807f7613 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Wed Jan 14 21:04:09 2015 -0600 enable-werror for LODE build Change-Id

Re: Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/14/2015 03:36 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Stephan Bergmann >> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/12/2015 06:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>>> >>&

Re: Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/12/2015 06:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> FYI: the build are 'default build'. autogen.config contains pretty >> much nothing beyond >> --with-external-tar, --wtih-ant-home and somet

[Libreoffice-commits] buildbot.git: tb/tb_internals.sh tb/tb_phases.sh

tb/tb_internals.sh |9 + tb/tb_phases.sh|8 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) New commits: commit 186e577630b64fc20f8a856b1dfa1f118684 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Wed Jan 14 08:03:56 2015 -0600 detect Make 4.0 and use -O on make

Re: Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > No surprise, but I certainly would prefer if they also used > --with-distro=... switch :-) That is problematic. Take LibreOfficeLinux.conf: at first glance --without-junit --with-help are not something we want.. so that would requir

Re: Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:28:02PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: >> FYI: the build are 'default build'. autogen.config contains pretty >> much nothing beyond >> --with-ext

Jenkins verification of gerrit patches

As you may have noticed, Jenkins is now setting 'Verify +1' on patches it built successfully. It does not set -1 yet, as the failure mode are still unreliable at times... It start putting V+1 because now Jenkins do build on all 3 main platforms (at first it was building only Mac, then Mac and Windo

Re: Looking to Get Involved

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Renato Ferreira wrote: >> I’ve been looking to get involved for a while but I am not really sure >> where to start, it will defiantly be small. ;) I’ve checked out and built >> the code and I did run into a problem with one of the unit tests, the >> specific proble

Re: Build / packaging instructions

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Will Entriken wrote: > Hello, I am looking for build instructions be able to reproduce the builds > that are actually distributed by LO. > > For example, the latest Mac build is called LibreOffice_4.3.4_MacOS_x86.dmg > with hash 9e466cdd41ab29e0845267f6e46ed7c6edb7

Re: Build / packaging instructions

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Will Entriken wrote: > Hello, I am looking for build instructions be able to reproduce the builds > that are actually distributed by LO. --with-distro=LibreOfficeMacOSX --with-lang=ALL --disable-systray --with-gdrive-client-id=xx --with-gdrive-client-secret=yy

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: solenv/bin solenv/gbuild

solenv/bin/write_classpath.sh | 16 solenv/gbuild/Jar.mk |6 +++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit 4ca4050de7a33985b359b527a59abac3ac3a87f5 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sun Dec 21 18:44:27 2014 -0600 try to keep

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: >> >> But that is a special case... making this available under tb is still >> a valuable thing to make it easier for people running such tb-box to >> include code coverage in the mix. >> > Now Im confused. Why would you want to run the same co

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > > If still interested (and my tests completes as expected), I could submit the > contents of my .tb directory somewhere, but im not too sure if that's still > needed or relevant anymore with your current modifications/version of the > script:

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > > However, doesnt the 'make it run it all in one call' implementation conflict > at least a little with the previously stated desire to run the code coverage > on other tests than just 'make check' ? again being flexible does not mean that on

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Hi , > > Also, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: >> >> SRC_DIR = $(pwd) >> BUILD=SRC >> > These defaults set the source and build directory to the same > value/dir

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > No, of course not, I guess. But the alternative to using all the internal > libraries, is installing all required libraries in the right versions > required on the system, and then doing --with-system-foo for all of them. that is a trade-off

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Hrm. > > > It appears I get the openldap build error when I do the build like this > (like it happens with the tb script) : > > $ LDFLAGS+='-fprofile-arcs' > $ CFLAGS+='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage' > $ CXXFLAGS+='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-cover

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Hi, > > > Thanks for the update. Ive hopped on irc for a bit, and have been playing > around with buildbot/tb for a few days for myself as well. We really should > talk more often. ;) Usually I am on irc quite often (well for my time zone :-

Re: Scheduling lcov code coverage script

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Hi, > > > One of the things I tried to communicate in my previous email, I perhaps may > have tried to convey in a too subtle a manner to be noticed. So I will > attempt to formulate it again in a slightly more explicit manner: > ;) > > With th

Re: Who knows of a free UML tool to work with libreoffice?

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:41 AM, nicholas ferguson wrote: > At times it can help track down the 'has a" and "is a" relationships. > Anyone used a free UML with libreoffice….that proved a good tool? on occasion I used http://www.umlet.com/ to represent visually the relationship between classes 'G

Re: Separate sourcecode and build directory error

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Hi, > > > Im trying to set up a separate libreoffice source code and build directory, > but am running into the following error : > > > $ mkdir /tmp/build > $ cd /tmp/build > $ /home/user/libreoffice-source/autogen.sh ^^^ autogen.sh already ru

Re: [ANN] new internal jpeg needs nasm

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on replacing internal jpeg with jpeg-turbo. > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/12402/ > > Once it hits master, you will need to get nasm tool to build it. > http://www.nasm.us/ > Info about how to install it, is in our co

Re: [ANN] new internal jpeg needs nasm

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on replacing internal jpeg with jpeg-turbo. > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/12402/ > > Once it hits master, you will need to get nasm tool to build it. > http://www.nasm.us/ > Info about how to install it, is in our co

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

> > but if we seriously want a hosted system, the only thing that is know > to work is LDAP... > I'm not quite fluent in ldap, but I am under the impression that it is > not well suited to 'open public registration' kind of scheme I stumbled upon: https://code.google.com/p/pwm/ so maybe ldap

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>>> I think that the most promising alternative would be to set up OpenID >>>> service on TDF infrastructure. >> >> between fedora, &g

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:43 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote: >> >> Just to inform you, that Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 >> service on April 20, 2015, as explained in this announcement [1]. >> ... >> I think that the most promising alternati

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 11/11/14 16:14, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> so that leave 670 people that _need_ to do something before Aprils >> 2015, or they won;t be able to log-in (and btw fixing that _after_ the >> fact will be a MAJOR pita.) &g

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

For the record We have 682 distinct gerrit registered user with a google-based openid (out of 810 registered users) unless I screwed up my sql statement, I count 12 account that have another openid provider beside google so that leave 670 people that _need_ to do something before Aprils 2015, or

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 11/11/14 15:07, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:43 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote: >>> > >>> > Just to inform you, that Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 >>> > service on April 2

Re: Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 on April 20, 2015

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:43 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote: > > Just to inform you, that Google shuts down the OpenID 2.0 > service on April 20, 2015, as explained in this announcement [1]. > > I know that some folks use it for Gerrit authentication. Does github has a openid 2.0 service ? does it wor

Re: Migration of Gerrit to new Infrastructure - DOWNTIME planning

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Alexander Werner wrote: > Hi all, > > good news, everyone! Our new infrastructure has proven to be stable and > reliable, so the time has come to migrate our gerrit instance to the new > platform. > This brings quite a nifty benefit: The VM gerrit is running in w

Re: master build fails on units-tests on MAC OS-X

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Adam Fyne wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can't seem to build master on MAC OS-X when unit-tests > are turned on. I heard that in order to build on MAC - you need > to disable unit-tests. Is that true ? on master there is a test that fail on retina, mostly due to roundi

Re: lcov code coverage script

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Hoes > wrote: >> >> I created a shell script that creates a lcov code coverage report of >> running 'make check' on the libreoffice code. Ive run it a few times, and it >> seems to be doing what I inten

Re: master build fails in calcoptionsdlg.cxx

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 07/11/2014 09:37, Tor Lillqvist a écrit : >>> >>> The error seems to come from my build option --disable-opencl in my >>> autogen.input. >> >> Yeah; —disable-opencl is not a good idea in master right now. > > Why? I was thinking that

Re: 'master' 'make check' lcov code coverage report

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: >> >> > nevermind, I guess this is it: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit yep :-) > > one more question: is it possible to change your gerrit username after you > hav

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 2 commits - linguistic/source sc/source

linguistic/source/spelldsp.cxx |4 +++- sc/source/ui/optdlg/calcoptionsdlg.cxx |5 - 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit fe076b977661679842d44ecf21a66fca4d96ce33 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Fri Nov 7 19:48:19 2014 -0600 sc, opencl

Re: 'master' 'make check' lcov code coverage report

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Maarten Hoes wrote: >> >> all these 3 point could be solved by putting that job under jenkins >> control.. I'll have a look at doing that. >> > Alright, so no complex error handling code then. But I guess you still will > want the script to exit with a non-zero exit

Re: 'master' 'make check' lcov code coverage report

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Maarten Hoes wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Markus Mohrhard >> wrote: >> > >> > Maybe not weekly but bi-weekly or monthly. Otherwise it will only be >> > done from time to time without a plan. >>

Re: Build broken with --enable-headless

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: > Hello, > > Il 05/11/2014 10:35, tarungoyal ha scritto: >> >> Command used: ./autogen.sh --without-java --enable-headless >> --with-theme='' >> --with-package-format=deb --enable-epm --disable-vba >> --disable-extensions >> --disable

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ... - correction ...

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > And also, my comment was never meant as a criticism of "someone not > doing the job". It was rather a simple piece of feedback that I hoped > would be useful for future hackfest planning. > > So, let's not take this as a "failure" please.

Re: 'master' 'make check' lcov code coverage report

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Maarten Hoes wrote: > Looking briefly at the differences (or lack thereof) in the reports of both > 11-Apr-2014 and today, I cannot help but wonder if running the report as > often as weekly would be beneficial at this point. Doing it manually once > every few mont

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: crashrep/source

crashrep/source/unx/main.cxx | 258 +-- 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) New commits: commit bbdd3da43d37ea4fdbcc2dc3ad8b4800020e71e8 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Nov 1 09:52:30 2014 -0500 crashrep: get rid of tmpnam

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: lotuswordpro/source

lotuswordpro/source/filter/lwptools.cxx |3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) New commits: commit 513956cfaddda21b82af76f2c79ed2f2ddec2c82 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Nov 1 01:32:46 2014 -0500 coverity#1250437 : Ressource Leak Change-Id

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 3 commits - sw/qa vcl/quartz

Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Thu Oct 30 13:10:46 2014 -0500 disable specific oox_export unit for macosx the magic number in this test does not seems to agree with Mac Retina Display (Assumed because the non Retina tinderbox do not complain) Change-Id

Re: minutes for call about new testing hardware

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> With VAT you are at 7995e, without storage or bandwidth. that leave >> you with 1344euro net-VAT for storage and bandwidth. even with a cap >> of 1GB per month of bandwidth that leave us

Re: minutes for call about new testing hardware

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen > wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>> 1/ this price is without VAT ( add 19% : >>> http://aws.amazon.com/tax-he

Re: minutes for call about new testing hardware

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> 1/ this price is without VAT ( add 19% : >> http://aws.amazon.com/tax-help/european-union/ ) >> 2/ no storage ??? add 1.2$ per GB per year..

Re: minutes for call about new testing hardware

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:57:21PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure >> wrote: >> > Le 28/10/2014 17:13, Markus Mohrhard a écrit : >> > [...] >> >> ** real hardware >> >> ***

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: distro-configs/LibreOfficeMacOSX64.conf distro-configs/LibreOfficeMacOSX.conf

distro-configs/LibreOfficeMacOSX.conf |1 - distro-configs/LibreOfficeMacOSX64.conf | 15 --- 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-) New commits: commit 938e7cf3e84c16a63b49a1049268fe3a3f772d4b Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Fri Oct 10 03:37:08 2014 -0500 Mac distro config

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 5 commits - cui/source sc/source vcl/source

deletions(-) New commits: commit ced24ffba2fa1754c466b7944b0ee06d21292706 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 4 14:58:02 2014 -0500 coverity#1242365: Unchecked return value Change-Id: Iddb8b1bad29bf372f9485514e2cde195237e3cc3 diff --git a/vcl/source/window/window.cxx b/vcl

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: config_host.mk.in configure.ac instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice solenv/bin

(-) New commits: commit 3104fba6051328cb827042272fc6bccf05ccf5fb Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Fri Oct 10 10:33:37 2014 -0500 kill OUTPATH Change-Id: I91806c3a55905dfd1ae90a10bc890cc526ff3270 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/11908 Reviewed-by: Andras Timar Tested

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: external/libmwaw

external/libmwaw/Library_mwaw.mk |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 9cf46f217424921e35aa7458c7cfd6b2a87bd2a9 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 18 23:03:46 2014 -0500 typo in filename, hidden by case insensitivity of windows Change

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 2 commits - external/libmwaw tools/source

external/libmwaw/Library_mwaw.mk |6 ++ tools/source/generic/rational.cxx |7 --- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit 4b71bb35a7c04fef4ed86591d8892a29c4150c0b Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 18 20:54:45 2014 -0500 work around

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: libreofficekit/Module_libreofficekit.mk Repository.mk

Repository.mk |2 +- libreofficekit/Module_libreofficekit.mk |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit c68642d535f2ebb7f1cd866ad19b1fd018e7cd6d Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 18 15:44:12 2014 -0500 tilebench

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 3 commits - configure.ac

configure.ac | 17 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) New commits: commit e6fe8387788b98b4bae43b466075f3938f3fb50c Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 18 15:07:19 2014 -0500 we should convert to DOS path for other exotic things than spaces too

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

configure.ac | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) New commits: commit 76397a8b53d2043dd7a6dc94e521bd7958148fae Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sat Oct 18 13:52:16 2014 -0500 windows: try to locate a good MSBuild.exe based on the version of VS lcms2 for instance

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >