[Libreoffice] Debugging Make Fetch bash scripts on Mac OS X 10.6.7

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Teeson
As part of my exploring a Mac OS X 10.6.7 Xcode 3.2.4 project I setup a clean libo environment and did Make fetch The file libo/src/fetch.log has entries such as this: % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-10 Thread Peter Teeson
Thanks for your thoughts Norbert. On 2011-05-09, at 7:46 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: Hi Christian: [...] Precisely. So maybe the time is now to start up an Xcode IDE version. That is very unlikely. when we move

[Libreoffice] Mac dependencies needed - Yes or No?

2011-05-10 Thread Peter Teeson
This wiki says to install Mac dependencies: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build#Dependencies This e-mail from Christian says they are not needed: May 1, 2011 11:04:38 AM EDT To: Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net ... There are no dependencies other than XCode

[Libreoffice] Error in make fetch - checksum failure

2011-05-10 Thread Peter Teeson
I am starting form scratch just to see if I understand things better this time round. But make fetch had one error fetching b4cae0700aa1c2aef7eb7f345365e6f1-translate-toolkit-1.8.1.tar.bz2 % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Tor: On 2011-05-09, at 3:43 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, You mean, as in building all (?) of LibreOffice in the Xcode IDE (or some other IDE), in such a way that the IDE actually would have parsed the source code etc and thus

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: Hi Michael *: What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, SDK 10.6 What context are you talking about? regarding 10.6 SDK: Well

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian, *,: On 2011-05-09, at 12:56 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Peter, *, On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: On 2011-05-09, at 4:02 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Peter, *, snip Oh, different build configurations is of course no problem, that would just be adding a configure switch --with-macosx-sdkversion - but maintaining the actual code for two different variants is. I just don't

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6 - [SOLVED}

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
On 2011-05-09, at 7:57 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: [...] It was indeed!! I compared the regular OS X 10.6 Fonts directory with the clean one andthey were identical. Then I looked at ~/libray/Fonts and lo and behold

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOS X Crash of 3.4 Beta same as crash on 3.3.2

2011-05-08 Thread Peter Teeson
On 2011-05-08, at 4:33 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 05/08/2011 04:00 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: snip I did read the Partial Debug build instruction but I am not sure I understand. Is this what I should do? In a new Terminal session cd git/libo source MacOSXX86Env.Set.sh cd sc rm - r

[Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK = 10.6

2011-05-08 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Michael *: What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, SDK 10.6 up and the LLVM compiler? What order of magnitude might bethe scope of work in terms on person hours? respect Peter ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6

2011-05-07 Thread Peter Teeson
smile of satisfaction OK Now I have a successful build I would like to work on my original issue. Using the downloaded 3.2.2 LO I get a reproducile crash on my regular Mac OS X 10.6.6 system. But no problem on a brand new Mac OS X 10.6.7 installation (separate partition and nothing else except

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6 [Success 3.4 dmg made But see new thread - it crashes same way]

2011-05-07 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: I don't know where you are but I would like to buy you a beer (or other beverage)! You have been an amazing mentor to me and I really appreciate your help patience. See below for successful .dmg. It seems I built 3.4 which is OK with me. Because it too crashes on my system with

[Libreoffice] MacOS X Crash of 3.4 Beta same as crash on 3.3.2

2011-05-07 Thread Peter Teeson
OK Christian Band of Brothers Sisters: We have a reproducible crash situation that we should be able to diagnose. See below for crash log extracts. Now it's time for me to build a version with debugging turned on for Calc. In the other thread you said: (b) If the just built version crashes

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-06 Thread Peter Teeson
On 2011-05-06, at 5:36 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: H Peter, On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 13:54 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: Hm, did you give --enable-ccache-skip on autogen/configure? It seems your ccache does not properly eat those arguments. .. Where do we go from here? Thorsten

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-06 Thread Peter Teeson
Thanks Christian, *: On 2011-05-06, at 12:05 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Peter, *, On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: [...] OK my version of ccache is 3.1.4 And are you sure that this is also used when building? Please show configure's output

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-06 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian,*: Man you are so patient with me and I bow to you. On 2011-05-06, at 4:37 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: snip If that is all, you installed ccache, but no build will use it. To use it you must either set symlinks of the compiler's name to ccache and put those links in a path

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Update on how this worked. On 2011-05-04, at 6:58 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: Hi Michael et al: Tried everything suggested so far. Same build failure. Peter P.S. Right now going to watch the evening news whilst doing: Gandalf:git pteeson$ rm -dfR libo Gandalf:git pteeson$ git clone git

Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Thanks for your patience and help Thorsten See below. respect Peter On 2011-05-05, at 5:46 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Peter Teeson wrote: --- my comments questions - (0) The symbolic links are correct (1) What does it mean to please re-run build

[Libreoffice] Fwd: First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Teeson
Sorry forgot to cc the list. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net Date: May 5, 2011 1:53:59 PM EDT To: Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies On 2011-05-05, at 11

[Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete dependancies

2011-05-04 Thread Peter Teeson
Well I resumed the first build and it seems as though the downloads did finally complete. But the post download checks indicate incomplete dependencies. What to do from here? (Don't get me wrong - I do appreciate this is all volunteer effort) (But I'm not used to this anymore... I'm on a Mac

[Libreoffice] First build has stalled...

2011-05-03 Thread Peter Teeson
Having got ./autogen to work I decided to try a Buid. And it has stalled for over an hour at this point. Last login: Tue May 3 16:44:24 on ttys000 Gandalf:~ pteeson$ cd git/libo Gandalf:libo pteeson$ make checking build system type... i686-apple-darwin10.6.0 ... = libs-core =

Re: [Libreoffice] ./autogen failed.... on Mac OS X 10.6.6 Please advise me where to get help on this issue...

2011-05-02 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: On 2011-05-01, at 11:04 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Peter, *, On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net wrote: [...] In order to see if things work as Christian described here is my plan. Since I have loads of HDD available I will setup a new

Re: [Libreoffice] ./autogen failed.... on Mac OS X 10.6.6 Please advise me where to get help on this issue...

2011-05-01 Thread Peter Teeson
I've now joined dev libreoffice list and usually bottom post. (also unsubscribed from users since it's not really the lists for my kind of questions.) Clemmit Andras Thanks for the CPAN URLs. Norbert I'll watch the ram when I get going. Thanks for the help Christian Thanks for the advice. I do

[Libreoffice] ./autogen failed.... on Mac OS X 10.6.6 Please advise me where to get help on this issue...

2011-04-30 Thread Peter Teeson
Greetings gentlemen: You were kind enough to encourage me previously to track down a bug. Since then I have installed the Mac dependencies, git, and the sources. Now I am trying to get to the point of doing a build but have hit a wall because ./autogen failed. I've googled Can't locate

[Libreoffice] Crash log attached....

2011-04-27 Thread Peter Teeson
As a retired Mac developer I would like to help track down this reproducible bug. Whom should I contact? Do I need to subscribe to the developers list? The crash log gives all the details of my setup. Both OpenOffice 3.3.0 and LibreOffice 3.3.2 exhibit this behaviour. Steps to reproduce: (0)

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-users] Re: Crash log attached.

2011-04-27 Thread Peter Teeson
...ple.ApplicationServices.ATS 0x93c16eb8 LLCLayoutText + 83 On 2011-04-27, at 8:06 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: Thanks for trying to reproduce it john I'll try DL'ing the Beta and see what happens. I'm on 10.6.6 and as for Mac 10.6.7 I want to hold off a bit longer. Peter On 2011-04-27, at 4:55 PM, Tinkerer