Hi All,
There was an email that was sent to this mailing list the other day,
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2018-May/080137.html
I did not see anyone commenting on this, therefore here we go.
It was some malware campaign, trying to get any recipients to click their link.
The
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:51 PM, toki wrote:
> All:
>
> Can somebody please explain to me, when, and more importantly, why
> LibreOffice is offering templates for Microsoft Office?
>
> http://templates.libreoffice.org/template-center/gantt-chart-simple
> being just one such example.
>
I am a bit
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan <
sharuzza...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Libreoffice developers,
>
> I was reading news about Sourceforge is hijacking nmap page in Sourceforge.
>
> When I listed the page owned by user sf-editor1, it looks like LibreOffice
> page and installer
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:37 PM, V Stuart Foote
wrote:
>
> Since then, the Chinese Office suite development by the likes of RedFlag
> 2000 (defunct), KingSoft, YozoSoft and CS2C with state sponsorship and
> academic research have refined the UOF national "standard" into a version
> 2.0
There
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> >>> The issue is in the decision to backport the first patch without the
> >>> configuration option (fdo#81309 only) to 4.3.1 and 4.2.7
> >>
> >> It was because of the translation requi
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Sonakshi Nathani <
sonakshinath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I really want to contribute for libreoffice. For that I went through
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks ,but i m
> really confused from where to begin and how to begin. If anyone can
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Protected Protected wrote:
> I'm a C/C++ developer and I'd like to join the mailing list to improve the
> quality of LibreOffice and to expand my experience in programming in a team.
>
Welcome to the development mailing list for LibreOffice!
I suppose you already
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, saransh kataria <
saranshistheb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am aspiring for GSOC 2013 and wished to know more details of how can I
> contribute to Libre Office regarding the same and while browsing last
> year's wiki, I found this mailing list.
>
> I request
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> So, all of a sudden I've started receiving these mails, and I'm not sure
> what to do.
>
> I've never subscribed to the commits list, and I had never received any
> warnings of this kind. I just started receiving them this morning.
>
Probab
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Marcos Souza
wrote:
> Hi LO guys!
>
> Can anybody tells me when GSoC will start?
>
You can apply as a student sometime in early March.
I suppose that GSoC 2013 with the full timetable will be announced
sometime in February,
so watch the website at http://code.goo
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Le 2012-09-27 12:00, Anton Meixome a écrit :
>>
>> What about l10n?
>>
>> I see in wiki being jforum the selected software. I'm a bit confuse
>>
>> May be a fork between Jforum and CodeRanch? As I don't find the
>> translation fram
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Michel Basilieres wrote:
> http://dalemarsden.com/..
>
It forwards to a page at a russian website. That page is currently down.
In any case, do not click on the URL.
Simos
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@l
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:39 PM, julien2412 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am i the only one to have the problem described there
> :https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
> I still reproduce it with master updated today, last commit :
> 1e91520e7af29c390c03d05b39992da5aaf6d1c7.
>
> Any idea ?
>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:55 PM, 810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, may I ask if it is possible to include ecofont
> > (www.ecofont.com/assets/files/ecofont_vera_sans_regular.zip) in
> > libreoffice?
> >
>
> Hi,
> Thank you for your s
Sometimes people forget the '-r' parameter in 'git pull -r' so it is
suggested to create an alias,
git config --global alias.up "pull --rebase"
(you run this command and the alias is added to your ~/.gitconfig
configuration file).
Then, you run
git up
whenever you want to updated your local re
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 10:47, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>>
>> Hi Norbert, Kohei,
>>
>> Kohei Yoshida píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 13:33 -0400:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud
>>> wrote:
The One Git conversion is done.
>>
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Sophie Gautier
wrote:
> Hi all,
> [please follow up on projects@ list]
>
> There is an planed effort to reduce and consolidate the number of git
> repositories in use (up to 20 currently) and migrate them using a git fetch,
> however it has some drawbacks with hist
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> In front of it insert "HE:" if Hebrew related
>
> Or "RTL:" if RTL-related in general?
>
> If many of the bugs are just different symptoms for an underlying general
> lack of RTL-awareness, it probably is not worth it to file individual bu
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ibrahim Beicker wrote:
> This is a very noobish ask for help but when I tried to build
> LibreOffice, the script autogen fails to detect 'fontconfig'
>
> here's the output
>
> checking for FONTCONFIG... no
> configure: error: Package requirements (fontconfig >= 2.2
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
wrote:
> Le 11/03/2011 13:37, Pantelis Koukousoulas a écrit :
>> Hi!
>>
>> This is a patch originally developed against openoffice in summer 2009
>> that has not yet been accepted due to, in my opinion, purely bureocratic
>> reasons / lack of in
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>>
>> I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository.
>> Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB.
>> You may have to run 'git
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been
> a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the
> project.
>
> Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just one
> big git
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:48:16PM +0300, Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>> I tried LibreOffice 3.4 (pre-release) and it works with 'csv' to 'ods'
>> conversion,
>> as described in
>> http://w
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:52:13PM +0530, Muthu Subramanian K
> wrote:
>> Seems to work for me without the patch. How old or new is your master,
>> please? [ Or I guess you are running without any input files! for the
>> conversion to work!
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:51 AM, sourava mishra wrote:
> Hello list,
> This is Sourava. I have a problem with the build process.
> when I give the "./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=6 --with-max-jobs=6
> --without-junit" command, it checks all the process and ends with
> "configure: error: Xaw include h
the issue is just with the
directory name
that was not renamed appropriately?
Simos
> Cheers
>
> Fridrich
>
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 17:57 +0200, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>> Apparently, the file LibO_3.3.2_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> should be updated wi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Andreas Proschofsky wrote:
>> Just a quick heads-up: Looks there is a problem with the linux RPMs for
>> 3.3.2 on the download server: The x86_64 files are missing completely,
>> instead the corresponding dir is an exact copy of the x86 d
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
wrote:
> According to further discussion with Simos, it seems that
> because the patch implements a new feature, a bug should
> be opened first.
>
> So, here is the bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35218
> with the patch att
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is a patch originally developed against openoffice in summer 2009
> that has not yet been accepted due to, in my opinion, purely bureocratic
> reasons / lack of interest from main devs
> (see http://openoffice.org/bugzil
29 matches
Mail list logo
