Hello Florian and others
Let me point out what matters. It's not that simple that I'm "one of
many applicants that's unhappy because a single one is selected". It's
that I was alrady doing the majority of items for years prior to
selection topping in QA reports and still someone else was chosen
On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22:
>
>> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website
while the update service is redirecting users of 6.4 to the 7.0
On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22:
>
>> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website
while the update service is redirecting users of 6.4 to the 7.0
It's done already. It's manual and tedious now.
I always wonder if it takes a script or new Bugzilla version to have a
single button for BZ admins.
And some more, like "see all reports by that commenter", "see all commits
by that dev".
Buovjaga, you follow BZ, is there any chance ?
Regards
On
Hello
Nice reports.
I hope you'll prepare yearly report for 2018 including also an
evolution for total number of open bugs and closed bugs.
QA blog page is narrow, it should be broadened. At least to the width
of blog.documentfoundation.org.
Best wishes in 2019.
Timur
Hi
Bug 57418 is on the list because last 3 messages were from
qa-ad...@libreoffice.org.
So not some malware, simply bugs without feedback.
On 8/14/17, Xisco Fauli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I modified this script [1] to check those bugs pinged more than
> once with
Hello all
I'm confused with all those Meta bugs. Looks like there are so many of
them that I wonder how that can help. I wasn't here on the list so I
don't know if that's explained somewhere.
In my view, we don't need them like that, and similar bugs can be
found by search.
Meta should gather
influence some decisions? Are
they still relevant? There should be some explanation.
Regards
Timur Gadzo
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 15:27 +0200, Timur Gadzo wrote:
I find that there should be an explanation in MAB 3.6. when exactly
will fixes for bugs resolved in LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs
be included in LO 3.6.
Right; that's not clear. Personally I prefer a rather shorter, more
Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 ..
says More conservative users should stick with LibreOffice 3.5.. It
should be explained until when.
Is it at some specific version, or when a line reaches Recommended
part of 3.6 at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibOReleaseLifecycle.png?
Regards
Timur
10 matches
Mail list logo