[Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi all, I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below. Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and described somewhere? I've been parsing idl files from libreoffice git repository (offapi/ and udkapi/) and hit some issues trying to #include dependencies. The c

Re: [Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi Michael, thanks for your reply! > it is described somewhere on openoffice.org... > ...but i can't find the well hidden documentation. Same here:-( > heh, i fixed that a lot on Monday, after discovering that a lot of its > files were not listed in the makefile at all; please git pull and try

Re: [Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks writes: > No problem, but please reply-to-all so we CC the list, for others to > find out what is going on & be helped by your questions too :-) [ feel > free to CC the list on your reply to this ;-]. sorry it wasn't meant to be a private message, I need to check better

Re: [Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks writes: > Ok :-) so you would have a native implementation of the UNO RPC > protocol? yes ;-) >> At the moment, I parse IDL files and hope (or have to make sure) that >> the installed libreoffice is compatible. > > So - in -theory- (for all interesting cases), the UNO

[Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi all, attached is a patch to fix some broken IDL files. Thank you, Tomas >From d66bf0eea556f71b25c526e7916d7aaea739c8a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 23:52:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] minor idl fixes --- .../sun/star/drawing/DrawingDocumentFactory.

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, > Nice work - thanks :-) It'd be great if you could give an explicit > licensing statement for your contributions; something like: > > "All my contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under >the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license" > > or somesuch :-) then we can add yo

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, >> This would allow us to get rid of the RDB files (although I need to >> familiarise myself with current use-cases to understand the impact of >> such change, e.g. merging in custom plugins). > > So, there are rather a number of hidden criteria for RDB files: > that they are ti

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann writes: > Historically, the situation is as follows: thanks a lot! > At runtime, the C++ UNO binding queries the types.rdb for certain data > (e.g., when (un-)packing data as ANY). OK. Does it need to go through the rdb file? It could as well be already compiled

[Libreoffice] split links, word import issue?

Hi all, I created a document xx.odt with a link. Then I saved the link as xx.doc. Then opened xx.doc and found that the single original link was split into several links, each link for one word or space from the original link label (see xx3.odt). It looks like the algorithm for word import shou

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > you are much more likely to get a reply for this kind of bug on the > dev list. sorry I haven't got the feel for the right places yet;-) > sounds like a bug to me. guess you should file it in bugzilla and set > the "regression" keyword. ok, I'll do that when

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Markus, Markus Mohrhard writes: > Ok, I wrote a simple c++ based test for that wow, thank you very much! > and can't reproduce your problem. Hmm, I'll dig into it. I noticed there were some changes in the code regarding string handling, so maybe it might be related. > The test ( > http://

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Markus, > Ok, I wrote a simple c++ based test for that and can't reproduce your > problem. could you please advise me how to build and run the test case? I did: $ cd sc/ $ make and it built the tests. It seems to have run something called CHK from the console log, but where can I find the

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen writes: > Any you could try bibisect: http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/7683.html > to close in on the bug even more (and thus make it get fixed faster). bibisect is brilliant but unfortunatelly dosn't cover the range I would need for this (v3.4.4+). Regards, Tomas

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 libreoffice-3.4.4.2 tag doesn't exist:-( Any other ideas? Are there any rules how tags are created and named? And branches? Thank you, Tomas ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

[Libreoffice] License statement

Hi, all my current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project are done under the LGPLv3 / MPL1.1 or later version of these licenses. Until further notice, all my future contributions to the LibreOffice project are available under the LGPLv3 / MPL1.1 or later version of these licenses.

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Also, I attach a few more patches. Thank you, Tomas >From da9fb395502bb2066db60dd4e69a6c69a5d8bb8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:57:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] fix broken ifndef/define guard in idl --- .../star/frame/DoubleInitializationExc

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann writes: > On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > >> diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >> b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl >> ... > > Are you sure that this is right, using chart2 entities

[Libreoffice] UNO Object Life Cycle question

Hi all, I'm implementing and can't make much sense of it. It seems to me that the spec is contradictory: ... unless it considers as bridged in any tuple , where t' is a subtype of t (i

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann writes: > On 01/05/2012 09:38 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> Stephan Bergmann writes: >>> On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >>> >>>> diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl > > What exactly is bro

Re: [Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks writes: > Thanks ! - I pushed it to master; it also seems to be in the 3.5 > branch, so hopefully it should be there too for you in the release :-) Thank you! Tomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Re: minor idl fixes

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > thanks for these patches, i've pushed > 0001-fix-broken-ifndef-define-guard-in-idl.patch, > 0002-fix-package-in-idl.patch, 0005-chmod-x-on-java-files.patch. great! > 0003-idl-fix-package-names.patch seems to be wrong, as discussed in the > other mail (and i'v

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO Object Life Cycle question

Hi Paul, > My own experience with this protocol is with a Delphi client [snip] > I've notice that an unreleased objet persist after disconnection, > [snip] AFAIK all the objects should be just droped down on > disconnection, but they're not. interesting, do you have any measurements of how much m

Re: [Libreoffice] UNO Object Life Cycle question

Hi Stephan Stephan Bergmann writes: > No, the sending side increments its ref count multiple times for a > given tuple it sends, unless it earlier received that tuple from the > other side (i.e., it is "bridged in" at this side), in which case it > does not increment the ref count at all. great

Re: extraordinary stoc/ thrash ...

Hi Stephan, thanks for the very informative long post! Some time ago we discussed something along the lines of modernizing rdb related code. I wrote an IDL parser and the java generator unoidl2java is getting almost complete. I have a few small patches lined up but I'd like to get the java gene

[Libreoffice] minor idl fixes

service BrowseNodeFactory { interface XBrowseNodeFactory; }; singleton theBrowseNodeFactory { service BrowseNodeFactory; }; }; }; }; }; }; Thank you, Tomas >From 0f8ee80872a99fa0cf903580c00b6b0ec1bc6491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19

Re: Import filters and Features

Hi Fridrich and Miklos, thank you for your emails and all that info! Cheers, Tomas ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

>From 843fefde549b2e3254d95325cc173622e4544eef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:42:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] allow passing FilterOptions via cli fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36313 Examples: --infilter="Text (encoded):UTF8,LF,,," --convert-to "htm

[libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

>From 843fefde549b2e3254d95325cc173622e4544eef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:42:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] allow passing FilterOptions via cli fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36313 Examples: --infilter="Text (encoded):UTF8,LF,,," --convert-to "htm

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: desktop/source

desktop/source/app/cmdlinehelp.cxx |7 +-- desktop/source/app/dispatchwatcher.cxx | 31 --- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) New commits: commit 45ba4d79d968f81f74ef0c4588fd15b1ce91153f Author: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue Jun 3 12:42:47

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

to handle that? Thank you, Tomas On 06/04/2014 01:04 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 06/03/2014 02:01 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> I wrote a patch to allow passing FilterOptions via cli, >> which fixes <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36313>. >> The patch is a

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

Sorry, I meant 4.3.3 as 4.3.2 is in freeze already. On 08/09/14 17:10, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi all, > > would it be possible to cherry-pick > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=45ba4d79d968f81f74ef0c4588fd15b1ce91153f > to the 4.3.2 release? It is cur

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

nt to use FilterOptions but silently give up when they find it broken. Thank you very much! Tomas On 09/09/14 10:20, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/08/2014 05:13 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> Sorry, I meant 4.3.3 as 4.3.2 is in freeze already. >> >> On 08/09/14 17:10, T

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-3' - desktop/source

desktop/source/app/cmdlinehelp.cxx |7 +-- desktop/source/app/dispatchwatcher.cxx | 31 --- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) New commits: commit 4b8a0159ca80dad05ddcaad5897b786484fc8afb Author: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue Jun 3 12:42:47

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

Hi Stephan, thank you very much! I'll try it when it's available from the daily builds. Tomas On 10/09/14 12:24, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/09/2014 11:57 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> It would definitely help us to have the bugfix earlier then in v4.4. > > ..

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

Hi Stephan, I confirm that LibreOfficeDev_4.3.2.0.0_Linux_x86-64_rpm and LibreOfficeDev_4.3.3.0.0_Linux_x86-64_rpm from the latest daily builds work. Thank you very much! Tomas On 11/09/14 11:56, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > thank you very much! I'll try it when it&#x

Re: [libreoffice] allow passing FilterOptions via cli

it was be acceptable? Thank you, Tomas On 04/06/14 14:28, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 06/04/2014 02:16 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> From your remark >> <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36313#c17> I understand, >> that it does not seem very user frien

Import filters and Features

Hi Fridrich, it was great talking to you at the Linux Tag in Berlin on Saturday. I hope you don't mind me CCing the mailing list, in case somebody else finds it interesting and could provide some info. Inspired by your talk about import filters, I would like to ask what is the usual strategy to