I always remove the splash screen by changing the value of line 3 of
*/opt/libreoffice5.0/program/sofficerc* from Logo=*1 *to Logo=*0*
So look for sofficerc (Linux version) or soffice.ini (Windows version) or ??
(MacOS version -- I don't have access to this OS).
Splash screens are, for me, an
Bonjour Sophie,
Here are 2 bugs I found in LO 4.3.0RC2 (Linux 64 bits) :
1. Calc : if you use the formula assistant (editor), a tiny font is used in
the cell (old and known bug that one affected LO);
2. Wrong behavior for thumbnails preview in the opening panel if your file
is password
No problem with RC2 64bits deb version on Ubuntu/gnome-shell 13.10 and french
locale for LO.
Raymond
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-4-2-0-2-opens-OLH-in-browser-instead-of-its-own-OLH-tp4091348p4091602.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
I had the same behavior with 4.2.0.0 beta1. Right now I'm using:
Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2
Build ID: 1a27be92e320f97c20d581a69ef1c8b99ea9885d
64 bits, Ubuntu-Linux 13.10. I installed also the two french tar.gz packages
for localisation and for help. A few strings don't appear in french (mostly
in
I confirm that fluidity is back also on win32 version (winxp at the office),
LO 4.0.1.1.
Raymond
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Regression-LO-Writer-4-0-tp4038481p4039356.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm using LO version 4.0.1.1 (Build ID:
2c0c17a6e4bee0ee28131ea4bdc47edc700d659) since more than 3 hours on the same
262 pages long Writer document and the problem seems solved! LO 64 bits
linux .deb version.
Fluidity is back (like 3.6.x versions). I'll do the same check on win32
version when
I'm using LO version 4.0.1.1 (Build ID:
2c0c17a6e4bee0ee28131ea4bdc47edc700d659) since more than 3 hours on the same
262 pages long Writer document and the problem seems solved! LO 64 bits
linux .deb version.
Fluidity is back (like 3.6.x versions). I'll do the same check on win32
version when
Thank you Miklos and Jan for your suggestions.
I'm a power user of different office applications (like LO -- and OOo since
it's debut) but Im not a programmer.
Bibisect seems interesting but anyhow quite heavy to install, even in a
virtual machine... Maybe I'll give it a try.
The regression I
I'm using Writer since 2006 (it was then OpenOffice.org's version) for a
statistical document of 262 pages. You can see the result at
http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/publications/index.asp?page=ficheid=67
http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/publications/index.asp?page=ficheid=67
-- The
Well, no luck :-(
I checked with LO 3.3 final version (RC4) and the problem remains... It is a
regression from previous OpenOffice.org (before LO) where the file was
correctly calculated.
Raymond
--
View this message in context:
Like I said earlier, I submitted also this bug to OpenOffice.org and it was
marked as RESOLVED yesterday. See
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116164
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116164
I don't know how are the contacts (if any) between LO developers and OOo
11 matches
Mail list logo