Hi Maarten,
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:30:58PM +0200, Maarten Hoes
wrote:
> As for checking if skia gets built with gcc instead of skipped when clang
> is not available, what would be the best way to verify that ? I guess that
> after the build a 'libskia.so' or something should be present ? I h
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 5:22 PM Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> I agree with you that the status quo would not be useful (and don't
> think you are annoying in any way).
>
> I still strongly (but naively, without digging into the code in any way)
> assume that those tests are not failing for you all t
On 01/06/2022 16:57, Maarten Hoes wrote:
Ok, so let me see if I understood that correctly :
*if* lcov reports were to be generated automatically on a regular basis
again, then the desired behaviour would be to just let the build
fail/stop (whatever the reason, gcov related, spuriously failure,
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 2:07 PM Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
> So the general advice would be to ignore occasional failed builds (which
> might not only fail due to spurious test failures, but also because e.g.
> a build breaker got submitted by accident). If some specific tests
> cause enough b
On 31/05/2022 13:43, Maarten Hoes wrote:
Anyway, if more tests fail sometimes without there being a 'real'
failure, then I am not sure how to deal with that in relation to
generating an lcov report for a full build. My initial idea was to not
generate a report if 'make check' failed, but hearin
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:03 AM Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
> On 25/05/2022 14:38, Maarten Hoes wrote:
> > gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make UITest_solver
> > gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_solver
> > gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_swarmsolvertest
>
> I /think/ to rememb
Hi Miklos,
I totally agree that ideally, if the 'right' way to set these flags for
this build system is setting 'gb_GCOV=YES' on the make commandline, then
this should be fixed. However, I have no knowledge of this particular build
system or makefiles in general, so I am unable to fix that myself
Hi Maarten,
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:26:21AM +0200, Maarten Hoes
wrote:
> CFLAGS='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage' CXXFLAGS='-fprofile-arcs
> -ftest-coverage' LDFLAGS='-fprofile-arcs -lgcov' ./autogen.sh
> --enable-python=internal --without-system-libs --without-system-headers
> gb_GCOV=YES ver
On 25/05/2022 14:38, Maarten Hoes wrote:
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make UITest_solver
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_solver
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_swarmsolvertest
I /think/ to remember that at least some of those solver tests are time
based, so that they may o
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:13 AM Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:38:27PM +0200, Maarten Hoes <
> hoes.maar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've been trying to run 'make check' in combination with building
> > LibreOffice with gcov code coverage, and get failures for the f
Hi Maarten,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:38:27PM +0200, Maarten Hoes
wrote:
> I've been trying to run 'make check' in combination with building
> LibreOffice with gcov code coverage, and get failures for the following
> tests :
>
>
> gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make UITest_solver
> gb_GCOV=YES verbose
Hi,
I've been trying to run 'make check' in combination with building
LibreOffice with gcov code coverage, and get failures for the following
tests :
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make UITest_solver
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_solver
gb_GCOV=YES verbose=t make CppunitTest_sccomp_swarm
12 matches
Mail list logo
