Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Andreas Mantke
Am 22.10.22 um 15:58 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: Hi Andreas, all, Andreas Mantke wrote: I find it very shameful how much efford the board and it's members with a known and possible CoI on this topic invest to not enable further contributions and throw away a project which is evaluated important

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Chris, On 22/10/2022 13:15, Chris Sherlock wrote: On 22 Oct 2022, at 9:36 pm, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Hi Noel, On 22/10/2022 08:27, Noel Grandin wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke wrote: The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?)

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Andreas, all, Andreas Mantke wrote: > I find it very shameful how much efford the board and it's members with > a known and possible CoI on this topic invest to not enable further > contributions and throw away a project which is evaluated important for > the future of LibreOffice and TDF. >

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Chris Sherlock
On 22 Oct 2022, at 9:36 pm, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > > Hi Noel, > > On 22/10/2022 08:27, Noel Grandin wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke > > wrote: >> The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?) >> Conflict of Interest

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Chris, On 22/10/2022 12:32, Chris Sherlock wrote: On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 8:24 PM Andreas Mantke wrote: it would have been great, if you'd explained that you are working for the company which forked away from LibreOffice Online

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Noel, On 22/10/2022 08:27, Noel Grandin wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke wrote: The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?) Conflict of Interest (CoI) on just this topic. This is just another way of attempting to exclude

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Chris Sherlock
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 8:24 PM Andreas Mantke wrote: > it would have been great, if you'd explained that you are working for > the company which forked away from LibreOffice Online > (https://www.documentfoundation.org/gethelp/developers/). > > Thus you have on this specific topic (the online

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, Am 22.10.22 um 08:27 schrieb Noel Grandin: On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke wrote: The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?) Conflict of Interest (CoI) on just this topic. This is just another way of attempting to exclude

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-22 Thread Noel Grandin
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:32, Andreas Mantke wrote: > The whole action was driven by members of the board with a (potential?) > Conflict of Interest (CoI) on just this topic. > > This is just another way of attempting to exclude everybody you disagree with. The way you define COI, everybody

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-21 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Chris, Am 21.10.22 um 16:47 schrieb Chris Sherlock: On 21 Oct 2022, at 11:29 pm, Andreas Mantke wrote: Hi, I find it very shameful how much efford the board and it's members with a known and possible CoI on this topic invest to not enable further contributions and throw away a project

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-21 Thread Chris Sherlock
On 21 Oct 2022, at 11:29 pm, Andreas Mantke wrote: > > Hi, > > I find it very shameful how much efford the board and it's members with > a known and possible CoI on this topic invest to not enable further > contributions and throw away a project which is evaluated important for > the future of

Re: (was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-21 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, I find it very shameful how much efford the board and it's members with a known and possible CoI on this topic invest to not enable further contributions and throw away a project which is evaluated important for the future of LibreOffice and TDF. And this whole topic shows that this board

(was: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20)

2022-10-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 20/10/2022 16:29, Miklos Vajna wrote: * BoD asks whether we can re-evaluate LOOL atticisation (Stephan/Xisco)   + criteria is "see if there are 3 devs with non-trivial commits at ", see  

[Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2022-10-20

2022-10-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
* Present: + Stephan, Caolan, Ilmari, Hossein, Cloph, Miklos, Tomaz, Thosten, Olivier, Michael S, Kendy, Gabriel * Completed Action Items: + see if there are 3 devs with non-trivial commits at (Xisco) + Enable firebird as