Attached is a simple patch that starts adding code for a menu list for
potentially start center, or can be adapted very easily for another
purpose.
>From 8b875381fb23751e12f904e72f5bfef56fe17dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Aquilina
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 22:09:14 +0200
Subject: [PATC
Please use a package prefix starting with "org.libreoffice", not
"lo.UI". As long as this is just a very experimental non-functional
start that does very little, maybe "org.libreoffice.experimental"?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
Will correct and resubmit this patch and resubmit :)
On 11/04/2012 09:37, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Please use a package prefix starting with "org.libreoffice", not
"lo.UI". As long as this is just a very experimental non-functional
start that does very little, maybe "org.libreoffice.experimental"?
Sorry, but those patches don't create anything coherent, I think...
You apparently git rm'd the files you renamed but forgot to git add
them under the new name, or something. (Hint: git mv.) Could you
please use git rebase -i to "squish" together all the work into a
single patch, then I guess we co
Hey Tor
As requested I squashed these patches into a single patch and commit :)
will try and generate larger patches for submission instead of small
commits on the local branch and multiple patches :)
All my contributions past present and future are licensed according to
the licenses used by
The patch still creates files in an "android/UI" subdirectory (which
gives the wrong impression, that they would be *the* UI for LO on
Android, uses a weird "LO_UI" project name in the .project file and a
weird LO_UIActivity class name, and the LO_UIActivity.java file says
"import lo.UI.R". Could y
On 17/04/12 11:56, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
The patch still creates files in an "android/UI" subdirectory (which
gives the wrong impression, that they would be *the* UI for LO on
Android, uses a weird "LO_UI" project name in the .project file and a
weird LO_UIActivity class name, and the LO_UIActivit
