https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #13 from Commit Notification
---
Sheikha AL-Hinai committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #14 from Commit Notification
---
Michael Meeks committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #11 from sheikha ---
I add SAL_LIKELY, SAL_UNLIKELY ,SAL_HOT, SAL_COLD pair of macro in sal/types.h
,
before that I add
_SAL_BOOLEAN_EXPR which is an alternative way of using __builtin_expect which
is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #12 from jan iversen ---
you point at the ci build job not the patch.
the patch is
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/21070
I have added it to my review list.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #8 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I just dug throught he commit log for glib =) I'd be inclined to simply
re-use G_LIKELY and G_UNLIKELY with a SAL prefix myself.
That _G_BOOLEAN_EXPR trick
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com ---
As you like; we have less and less C these days I guess, and IIRC we compile it
as C++ (?) =)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
also note that GCC __builtin_expect (with its first parameter being of type
long) is plain, simple, and generally does not work as one would naively hope:
class C {
private:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com ---
I guess it might be worth talking to the glib developers; gmacros.h has a
reasonably workable version - however the _G_BOOLEAN_EXPR stuff is not the
ultimate in beauty =) The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #3 from Kohei Yoshida libreoff...@kohei.us ---
That header sal/inc/sal/macros.h these days lives in include/sal/macros.h.
BTW, there never was sal/inc/sal/macros.hxx. It was always
sal/inc/sal/macros.h.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Michal Strnad high...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |high...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #4 from Michal Strnad high...@gmail.com ---
I am working on this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
--- Comment #3 from Kohei Yoshida libreoff...@kohei.us ---
That header sal/inc/sal/macros.h these days lives in include/sal/macros.h.
BTW, there never was sal/inc/sal/macros.hxx. It was always
sal/inc/sal/macros.h.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Michal Strnad high...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |high...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39631
Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[EasyHack] add optimisation |add optimisation
18 matches
Mail list logo