https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #76 from Commit Notification
---
ekuiitr committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice@lists.freedeskt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #69 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #67 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #68 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #66 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #63 from Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #62)
Can I get this patch and correct to reapply the changes I've made?
Or I need to create a new patch?
something like git revert
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #64 from Alexandre Vicenzi vicenzi.alexan...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Michael.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #65 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #61 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #55 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
I just notice that this clean-up involves changing occurrences of sal_uLong to
sal_uIntPtr, and I doubt that is a good idea.
The sal_uLong typedef was originally introduced to do a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #56 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Michael Stahl committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Vicenzi vicenzi.alexan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #55)
I just notice that this clean-up involves changing occurrences of sal_uLong
to sal_uIntPtr, and I doubt that is a good idea.
The sal_uLong
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #58 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #57)
I understand your point of view, and probably it's the best idea. It's wrong
to put sal_uLong definition in sal/types.h?
Yes, that's wrong. sal_uLong is a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #59 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #60 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #54 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
not sure who had the crazy idea of hard-coding lo into dozens of library
loading calls... but clearly that silly lo suffix serves no useful purpose
and we
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #53 from Alexandre Vicenzi vicenzi.alexan...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Any idea of where to put SVLIBRARY, or it can't be touched yet?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #52 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #51 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #49 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #50 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #48 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #39 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #40 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #41 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #42 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #43 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #45 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #44 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #46 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #47 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Marcos Paulo de Souza committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #38 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #35 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Alexandre Vicenzi committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #36 from Marcos Souza marcos.souza@gmail.com ---
Hi guys,
I saw OSL_NETWORD, but it seems to bu unused inside the code. I'm missing
something?
Can you guys give an example of how to use this...?
Thanks a lot since now!
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #37 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #36)
I saw OSL_NETWORD, but it seems to bu unused inside the code. I'm missing
something?
Is part of the published URE API, so even if it is unused in LO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #33 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #32)
clearly any usage of DELETEZ of a member in a
destructor is bogus
even that need not be true in general
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #31 from Marcos Souza marcos.souza@gmail.com ---
Can I removed finally the DELETEZ macro too?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #32 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com ---
There are 600 or so hits of DELETEZ, in each case we'd need to work out whether
the memory could be re-used inadvertently and I guess add a manual NULL as/when
we think it could
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Qubit qu...@runcibility.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack,DifficultyBeginner |EasyHack DifficultyBeginner
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #78815|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
himanshu hcrobo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marcos.souza@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #21 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
himanshu, please, we don't need two people working on the same thing. (And this
is a too trivial task to count as experience for GSoC anyway.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #4 from Marcos Souza marcos.souza@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the tips Stephan!
I look at this when my patch about std::max get checked by the build checks.
Maybe Windows build could broke with this commit.
That patch is big, so I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
SVLIBRARY should not go into a URE header, as it codifies non-URE
knowledge---namely, that some LO libraries carry a lo in their name.
The best solution appears to be to keep this in a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #2 from Marcos Souza marcos.souza@gmail.com ---
Guys, and about this:
#define STRING_CONCAT3( s1, s2, s3 ) \
s1 s2 s3
// dll file extensions
#if defined WNT
#define SVLIBRARY( Base ) \
STRING_CONCAT3( Base, lo, .dll )
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
56 matches
Mail list logo