On 20 March 2012 11:17, Michael Stahl wrote:
> i think nobody really likes the way custom targets are currently
> implemented, and iirc Bjoern even denies being responsible for the design :)
So - I re-implemented them.
Hopefully it's now better and I did not break too much along the way.
With
h
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 21:04, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>> On 20 March 2012 11:17, Michael Stahl wrote:
>>> but please rename the CDPI variable to packimages_CDPI or expand it
>>> (also, CUSTOM_images, CUSTOM_PREFERRED_FALLBACK_[12])
>>
>> CDPI was suppos
On 20 March 2012 21:04, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 11:17, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> but please rename the CDPI variable to packimages_CDPI or expand it
>> (also, CUSTOM_images, CUSTOM_PREFERRED_FALLBACK_[12])
>
> CDPI was supposed to be custom-target-directory-packimages.
> That's not go
On 20 March 2012 11:17, Michael Stahl wrote:
> 1. var namespace collisions:
> because make doesn't have namespaces for global variables, it's
> possible that variables defined in different modules' custom
> makefiles have the same name and thus collide.
> this can be avoided by agreeing to
On 16/03/12 15:47, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose removing gbuild_simple.mk over time.
> Surely there will be more custom targets as gbuild is growing and I
> can't see why we would need gbuild_simple.
> Instead we can write rules to Package_foo.mk makefiles or if that
> would be
