I have zero insight into that area of the code, but from what I gather:
GrammarCheckingIterator::GetSuggestedEndOfSentence(rText, ...) -- where
rText apparently is one single paragraph -- used to be convoluted code
that always returns rText.getLength() for the last few years, whether
that chan
b5de20926bb25a6b298b4e5dffb66eb2 and LO4
> >
> > Yes, we can assume that was the original programmer intent.
> > But it worked another way for 3 years and nobody complained about it. :)
> > I prefer the unintended behavior, as LO does not assume wrongly what is
> the
>
>
> So what LO will do?
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocumented-change-in-the-API-for-LO-4-tp4030639p4041580.html
> Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
ew this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocumented-change-in-the-API-for-LO-4-tp4030639p4041580.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fr
On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 04:09 -0800, Olivier R. wrote:
> I bibisected from scratch again, on Linux Mint. I got no crash at all.
Looking at the log, (but without testing anything myself) the likely
relevant changes are...
c0f865c9b5a34b272c9e0b22d18969554265914a on
linguistic/source/gciterator.cxx w
foundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocumented-change-in-the-API-for-LO-4-tp4030639p4041086.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thursday 28 of February 2013, Olivier R. wrote:
> Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote
>
> > How exactly do you launch LO? If by calling install/program/soffice.bin
> > instead of install/program/soffice then the behavior is expected
> > (soffice starts and controls soffice.bin, which needs to re-start on
ng unequal
if 1 == os.access( encfile( path ), os.F_OK) and not path in sys.path:
And LO starts.
Olivier
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocumented-change-in-the-API-for-LO-4-tp4030639p4040599.html
Sent fr
On 02/27/2013 06:58 PM, Olivier R. wrote:
But I have to say that I am not really sure this result can be trusted. For
each times I bibisect, LO didn't launch at the first try, only on the second
try.
How exactly do you launch LO? If by calling install/program/soffice.bin
instead of install/pr
at means the
paragraph has been split as explained in my previous messages.
Direct link to download the French grammar checker:
http://www.dicollecte.org/download/fr/Grammalecte-v0.2.5.oxt
Regards,
Olivier
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocum
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 13:19 -0800, Olivier R. wrote:
> Hello Caolan,
>
>
> Caolán McNamara wrote
> > No idea, IMO it would be worth bibisecting this to find where it changed
> > to re-examine if it was intentional or not. Would then likely be a good
> > candidate for a unit test to lock in whiche
pl_en.name
g_ImplementationHelper = unohelper.ImplementationHelper()
g_ImplementationHelper.addImplementation( Lightproof, \
"org.libreoffice.comp.pyuno.Lightproof." + pkg,
("com.sun.star.linguistic2.Proofreader",),)
g_ImplementationHelper.addI
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 08:25 -0800, Olivier R. wrote:
> With LibreOffice 4, each paragraph of a text is passed several times to this
> function in the parameter aText, and the parameters nStartOfSentencePosition
> and nSuggestedBehindEndOfSentencePosition are the beginning and the end of
> each sent
to parse texts was better than the new one, as it’s
up to each grammar checker to decide what to do with the paragraph, how to
split it if necessary, etc.
Regards,
Olivier R.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Grammar-checker-Undocumented-change-in-the-API
14 matches
Mail list logo
