What's up! wow i just found this.. i just won my iPad2 for nothing, thats
right nothing.. you need to hurry up and get yours before it to late heres
the website.. http://so.ee/K50 code 39588976
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
How are you. I was messing around on the net and found this!! want a NFL
Jersey you can pick any team there only giving out!! 84 NFL Jerseys! hurry up
and get yours!! heres the link my friend.. http://sayabit.com/dbayoh
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libr
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
The original message was received at Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:32:29 +0700 from
35.150.96.253
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to 139.165.184.241:
554 ... Message is too large
554 ... Service unavailable
__
Hi everybody.im sorry to bother to you, but i wasnt sure where to go, im a very
low level editor on wikipedia and i had created the libreoffice writer and
libreoffice calc articles, they are quite small articles and were copied from
the oo.o articles and then heavily modified, but im sure giv
Hi Thorsten,
On Saturday, 2011-09-03 18:31:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
> > attachments pass through?
> >
> Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
> messages will still be delivered (that might
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
> attachments pass through?
>
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
previously had downstream filters for exactly tho
Hi Eike,
On 2011-09-01 at 12:18 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
> attachments pass through?
I'd say bug against the fd.o infa...
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lis
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 01:02:51 -0500, chars...@apple.com wrote:
> [... bla making it look like coming from a mailer-daemon ...]
and
[-- Attachment #2: document.exe --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 29K --]
Can we do something against letting all those .exe .s
Le 22/08/11 12:44, Alexander Thurgood a écrit :
Please ignore this particular message, which has appeared elsewhere
already, just Gmane and/or Thunderbird doing some strange things to my
"reply to list" button.
Caolan has already suggested something on this elsewhere.
Alex
___
Hi all,
After a fresh clone, I'm still seeing the following build breakage in
globlmn.hrc on Mac OSX :
svx 0 #define ITEM_FORM_CONTROL_PROPERTIES !defined _GLOBLMN_HRC 3 all
Con~trol... 20110821 20:34:29
^
f640:
"/Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/workdir/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svx/globlmn.hrc",
line 1
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:23 +0100, Brian Carter wrote:
> Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as
> a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt.
Can you expand on your pain ? ;-)
Really - I think the preferr
Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as
a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt.
Brian
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.
BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundat
From 6915ac8753f91b31fd0cafe87088ae266c3cba3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoine Proulx
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:07:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Removed dead code
---
sw/source/filter/rtf/swparrtf.cxx | 46 -
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Sorry, some times it happens.
--- Em dom, 5/12/10, Kayo Hamid escreveu:
De: Kayo Hamid
Assunto: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Para: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Data: Domingo, 5 de Dezembro de 2010, 1:32
Covering sd/source/{filter,helper}. Someone can look if I build the patch in a
correct
Hi,
@Wol
thanks for your answer.
I've already configured with '--enable-binfilter'.
binfilter builds except some sub-dirs 'bf_sd', 'bf_svx' and
'bf_xmloff' (and some others) and I have changes ready in there
but not tested.
For 'extension', make simply answers 'Presenter Screen build disabled'
a
Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
code since we started to code on LO...
I used SLOCCount by David A. Wheeler to
check our project size. At the time of the "fork" ie the
LIBREOFFICE_CREATE tag our clone directory was this big:
Total Physical Source Lines of Co
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
> rather dangerous :-)
Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and
effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest
ot
Hi there,
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
> code since we started to code on LO...
Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
rather dangerous :-)
Perso
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:04 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging
> fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly.
> Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be
> misinterpreted.
Right - I u
> #libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out
> regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter.
But isn't a lot of this lines of code that were commented out, or inside #if 0?
And how much of the change is due to changes in the OOo milestones that
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
> code since we started to code on LO...
Howdy Sebastian,
Outstanding - this is a figure we are confident enough in to publish?
Sounds like it, but just to be sure..so, this is how I put it out
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:50:55AM +0100, Gert Faller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a little bit more...
>
Pushed, thanks!
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
a little bit more...
regards.
createFromAscii_8.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>From 09a62885c6c5aea12412d9bcb37a997bce87fa2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Niko=20R=C3=B6nkk=C3=B6?=
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:36:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Wrong option name in help
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kaben8Ohv4ahdainoh7Ohche4iequood
Hi Werner,
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:56 -0400, werner wrote:
> I'm making the SYS distro
> ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/linux/install/sys
Great :-)
> I always made own .tgz packages of OO.The basical
> package always was without the english language parts,
> and additionally I made languag
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
33 matches
Mail list logo
