On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:46:41AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:53 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ tripple cross-company code review for features until nearer RC1
+ exceptions: artwork, unit-tests until RC1
FWIW, I don't personally feel that triple reviews have
Petr Mladek schrieb:
Hi all,
as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the tag
libreoffice-3-5-branch-point.
Hello,
I am a little concerned what
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 13:52 +0100:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
Hi all,
as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the tag
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 13:52 +0100:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
Hi all,
as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the tag
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 14:26 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
+ only bugfixes are allowed
+ no approval needed during beta phase until Jan 9, 2012
So - there are a few other exceptions to the 'only bug-fixes' that the
TSC agreed:
+ tripple cross-company code review for
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:53 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ tripple cross-company code review for features until nearer RC1
+ exceptions: artwork, unit-tests until RC1
FWIW, I don't personally feel that triple reviews have to require
cross-company reviewers, just that when we're in a
Hi all,
as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the tag
libreoffice-3-5-branch-point.
The following rules apply:
+ only bugfixes are
