Caolán McNamara wrote:
So, let me get this straight. Various bits of tooling etc depend on
a /usr/bin/soffice right ? Is that the problem. So perhaps the solution
right, depends on a /usr/bin/soffice to reach the installation location
is to simply add a /usr/bin/soffice to go alongside /usr/b
So, let me get this straight. Various bits of tooling etc depend on
a /usr/bin/soffice right ? Is that the problem. So perhaps the solution
is to simply add a /usr/bin/soffice to go alongside /usr/bin/libreoffice
in the desktop-integration rpms.
C.
___
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Guiseppe,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 21:31 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO.
Did your patch(es) get merged ? if not that sucks, sorry - just working
not yet merged, but I had a quick chat with
Hi Guiseppe,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 21:31 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO.
Did your patch(es) get merged ? if not that sucks, sorry - just working
back through my mail. They look good to me - but for me the testtool
runs reasonab
Hi all,
the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO.
The first patch (0001-Correct) corrects a symlink created during
installation, I tested it under universal LibO install (pull +r
yesterday evening).
What it does should be reviewed by packager, since I don't know what it
