On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> So, to make things simple, let's force user having GNU tar, not BSD tar.
> Seriously why not supporting bsdtar?
OK,
I think BSD tar is as good as GNU tar :)
Let's close the topic here so that RMS won't jump into LibO cough-cough :)
-
Hi *,
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> On FreeBSD we use bsdtar (libarchive) and from my testings it works
>> great with libreoffice (no regression compared to gnu tar)
>>
>> here is an attempt to allow checkin
At 12:18pm -0500 Tue, 01 Feb 2011, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Seriously why not supporting bsdtar? It has a great effort is made to
make it gnu compatible in fact compatible with the largest possible
set of archive formats.
All the testing I have done with bsd tar shows it performs at least as
wel
2011/2/1 Nguyen Vu Hung :
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On FreeBSD we use bsdtar (libarchive) and from my testings it works
>> great with libreoffice (no regression compared to gnu tar)
>>
>> here is an attempt to allow checking for both bsdtar and gnu ta
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On FreeBSD we use bsdtar (libarchive) and from my testings it works
> great with libreoffice (no regression compared to gnu tar)
>
> here is an attempt to allow checking for both bsdtar and gnu tar in
> configure (against build gi
Hi,
On FreeBSD we use bsdtar (libarchive) and from my testings it works
great with libreoffice (no regression compared to gnu tar)
here is an attempt to allow checking for both bsdtar and gnu tar in
configure (against build git repository)
Hope this is ok
regards,
Bapt
diff --git a/configure.in
