On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
Compiling was ok
Pushed the first part.
For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
compiled with you do --enable-gio, which is probably why it compiled
On 01/17/11 04:16, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
Compiling was ok
Pushed the first part.
For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
compiled with you do
Le 17/01/2011 13:16, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
Compiling was ok
Pushed the first part.
For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
compiled with
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:57 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Ok. And to respond to Jesse Adelman, there is now the tracker 2479 on
cppcheck for this.
Oops I stepped on your toes there. I was also logging the test-case as
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2480
I'll mark one as a
Le 17/01/2011 22:15, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:57 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Ok. And to respond to Jesse Adelman, there is now the tracker 2479 on
cppcheck for this.
Oops I stepped on your toes there. I was also logging the test-case as
