Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in svx

2010-11-21 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:37:28AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:58:35PM +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > > MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ > > > > Joost > > The patch contains duplicate changes for svx/source/fmcomp/fmgridif.cxx > and svx/source/gengal/gengal.cxx .-) Otherwise

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in svx

2010-11-21 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:58:35PM +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ > > Joost The patch contains duplicate changes for svx/source/fmcomp/fmgridif.cxx and svx/source/gengal/gengal.cxx .-) Otherwise good. D. ___ LibreOffice maili

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in svx

2010-11-14 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:32:31PM +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ > (Hope 13e patch on the 13 has no mistakes in it:) ) > > Joost Thanks, pushed. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in svx

2010-11-13 Thread David Tardon
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:43:18PM +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ > > Joost Pushed. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in svx

2010-11-09 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:30:22PM +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Is it correct to have the RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM directly in the *.hxx > file. > If so, why not do that also at other places? > > MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ > > Joost Pushed, thanks! D. __