Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED 3-5][REVIEW-3-5-0] Danish dictionary 2.0

2012-01-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Andras, On Thursday, 2012-01-26 23:08:25 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:    version value=2012.01.14 / Is that really supposed to be '.' separator and not ISO 8601 '-'? It is just a version string... It is not parsed as date. Thanks, I slipped past the version and got drawn to the date

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED 3-5][REVIEW-3-5-0] Danish dictionary 2.0

2012-01-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 13:52 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: Please review and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-5-0 Pushed to 3-5 now, need another ack for 3.5.0 I presume. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED 3-5][REVIEW-3-5-0] Danish dictionary 2.0

2012-01-26 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Thursday, 2012-01-26 15:45:15 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 13:52 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: Please review and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-5-0 Pushed to 3-5 now, need another ack for 3.5.0 I presume. Ack'ed by me. Another one needed. And no, I didn't check

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED 3-5][REVIEW-3-5-0] Danish dictionary 2.0

2012-01-26 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/26/2012 10:52 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: One thing spotted though: in dictionaries/da_DK/description.xml we have version value=2012.01.14 / Is that really supposed to be '.' separator and not ISO 8601 '-'? Yes, see