Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/svx

2010-11-23 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joost, On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:59 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > It surprises me that it does not happen oftener, because I see no > coordination between the people working on > RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM. Sorry about that; some level of collision is inevitable with all this scalabl

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/svx

2010-11-22 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Perhaps a simple table in the wiki to assign oneself a task which is available and its planned deadline could be useful. Julien. Le 22/11/2010 21:59, Joost Eekhoorn a écrit : Hi, I did send my patch to the list and Julien did send his patch just after that. It was pushed this mornin

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/svx

2010-11-22 Thread Joost Eekhoorn
Hi, I did send my patch to the list and Julien did send his patch just after that. It was pushed this morning by David. It surprises me that it does not happen oftener, because I see no coordination between the people working on RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM. Joost 2010/11/22 Michael Meeks > Hi

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/svx

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 17:20 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Here's a patch for libs-core/svx It seems someone merged it without replying 'Pushed' ;-) Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _