Hi there,
I've found a better way to fix it. Attached is tailored specifically
for the 3-5 branch.
I'll port this fix to master separately since master has my earlier
commit that would make this patch not apply without adjusting.
Again, this fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:24 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 2012-01-24 11:42:57 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>
> > Did you check with libreoffice 3-5? I think that eike's work for date
> > patterns is missing in 3-5
>
> Yes, that's only on master.
>
> > so that this patch does
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2012-01-24 11:42:57 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Did you check with libreoffice 3-5? I think that eike's work for date
> patterns is missing in 3-5
Yes, that's only on master.
> so that this patch does reopen the bug we
> discussed on IRC. At least your unit test fails and I
Hello Kohei,
2012/1/24 Kohei Yoshida :
> Hi there,
>
> I would like
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c659e692a17cc10d364a2304bead9403fc6bdde
>
> to be backported to the 3-5 branch. It fixes
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45067
>
> Review and sign-off
Hi there,
I would like
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c659e692a17cc10d364a2304bead9403fc6bdde
to be backported to the 3-5 branch. It fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45067
Review and sign-off appreciated.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacke
