On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:01 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> the patch looks OK and safe to me.
I mean both of them.
R.
> Cheers
> Radek
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:45 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> >
Hi Thorsten,
the patch looks OK and safe to me.
Cheers
Radek
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:45 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
>
> Both are tested & work fine for me - they
Thorsten Behrens píše v Po 17. 01. 2011 v 15:45 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
>
> Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
> they'll definitely not make matters worse
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:45 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
..
> Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
> they'll definitely not make matters worse. ;)
Hi,
would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
they'll definitely not make matters worse. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
changeset: 274229:e8ffb0039660
user:
