Jean-Baptiste Faure schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> Several persons asked me if security fixes implemented in OOo 3.3.0 have
> been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
> embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
> confirm that.
I agree. Having a dis
Hi guys,
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 23:03 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I don't know what you count as authorized, but this is at least worth
> pointing people to:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2011/01/msg00287.html
Quite; and I will blog this as well (when I get on-line):
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:01:35PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Several persons asked me if security fixes implemented in OOo 3.3.0 have
> been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
> embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
> conf
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:01:35PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
Yes, it is.
> embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
> confirm that.
Well, we say we base on OOo 3.3, no?
I don't know what
Hi all,
Several persons asked me if security fixes implemented in OOo 3.3.0 have
been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
confirm that.
I think it is very important for LibreOffice's credibility wit
