Michael,
Sorry to be slow responding. I have not been ignoring you
just for the sake of ignoring you.
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 20:36 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Terrence,
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 14:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:But of course, before
> creating bug 40273, I did a bug
searc
Hi Michael, Terrence,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:22:10 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Heh - unfortunately, incremental building can be fraught with
> problems
> - mostly around dependencies; quite possibly we should have a 'make
> dep-clean' rule (or somesuch) that discards inter-file dependenci
Hi Terry,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:50:20 -0400
Terrence Enger wrote:
> I do have another "something goes wrong" that I have not
> mentioned here because I cannot say exactly how to make it
> go wrong. Is there a way that I can make LibreOffice log
> my actions--keystrokes, mouse clicks--so that I
Hi Terrence,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 14:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I just wish I could stop thinking about ways to
> attack the problem. ... I thought of another way
> even as I was writing the previous sentence.
:-)
> One SEGV has happened only with an earlier build. I do have
> a
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 11:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Terence,
>
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
> > rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
> > description.
>
> Heh - unfortunately, i
Hi Terence,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
> rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
> description.
Heh - unfortunately, incremental building can be fraught with problems
- mostly around depen
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Terry,
> If you're discussing code in detail you're much more than welcome
> here[1] :-) really looking forward to your first patch - do you have
> problems building that we can help out with ?
Harrumph. I started last week to do
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Huh - it is -extremely- valuable to do global cleans that remove
> unpleasant and hard-to-grok implementations from the code.
>
Sure.
> Just using the latest/newest/trendiest 'time' class from A.B.C.
> place de jour in new code is a(nother) maintenance nightmare
> wait
Hi Terry,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:45 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> Meta-reply: I am far from contributing a patch, so my
> thoughts are off-topic for this list. I am happy to take
> this conversation to private email or to the discussion list
> if that would better suit the list recipients.
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:55 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> It's unclear to me, how valuable it is to fix-up tools/time.hxx &
> all client code, vs. to use e.g.
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/chrono.html when you
> need a sane implementation in new code ...
Huh - it is -
Hi Lubos,
On Friday, 2011-08-12 20:25:26 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > 2) Why should GetSec() of a negative delta return a negative amount of
> >seconds?
>
> I didn't say it should be negative, it just should be sane. Which in this
> case should be ... uhm ... oh well, another botched API.
On Thursday 11 of August 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for
> > time having 25 hours, but 10 seconds without 20 seconds being 10 seconds
> > (and there is actually explicit code to ensure that)?
> >
> > Do
On Thursday 11 of August 2011, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> 2) Why should GetSec() of a negative delta return a negative amount of
>seconds?
I didn't say it should be negative, it just should be sane. Which in this
case should be ... uhm ... oh well, another botched API.
> The probability that so
Hi Lubos,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 14:43:28 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> #include
> ...
> printf( "%d\n", Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
> printf( "%d\n", ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
>
> 25
> 10
>
> As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for time
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for time
> having 25 hours, but 10 seconds without 20 seconds being 10 seconds (and
> there is actually explicit code to ensure that)?
>
> Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how
Meta-reply: I am far from contributing a patch, so my
thoughts are off-topic for this list. I am happy to take
this conversation to private email or to the discussion list
if that would better suit the list recipients.
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> [ Premise: If you th
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how much would
> break if I fixed these two to be sane?
I don't know, but I would guess that it is used for delta times as well
as "wall clock" times. That would certainly explai
[ Premise: If you think adding something to LO code is easy, you are still an
inexperienced LO developer. ]
#include
...
printf( "%d\n", Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
printf( "%d\n", ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
25
10
As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least
18 matches
Mail list logo
