Hi,
Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2010-11-16 16.22:
Do we want to have a support.libreoffice.org subsite, or do we want to
havewww.libreoffice.org/support?
for now, I'd go with the latter one, but that's just my feeling...
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> And "Your question may have already been answered - check the
> Community Forum at http://www.documentfoundation.org/nabble/ " is
> misleading, as that nabble is not a forum, but a mailing-list
> interface in forum-style look and feel.
>
Bah, details. ;)
(I think we re
Hi Jon, *;
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> [${PRODUCTNAME} source code was released back in October 2000. ]
Good catch - While the source is indeed available since 2000, I'm also
not sure about whether OpenOffice.org should be explicitly mentioned
here...
> Tried i
Thanks for giving Libre Office it's very own readme. One thing that popped
out at me from the Getting Involved section was this: "familiarize yourself
with many of the topics covered since the ${PRODUCTNAME} source code was
released back in October 2000. " I dunno if you want OpenOffice for a
pro
Hi Thorste, *,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> [...]
Thanks for the updates
> Latest readme for 3.3 attached for your reference. Many thanks for
> the feedback!
One point I missed when looking through the links the first time:
The mailing list archives will be moved
Sophie Gautier wrote:
> - the paragraph about changes on BerkeleyDB engine and extensions
> database incompatiliby seems strange when speaking about [for
> ${PRODUCTNAME} versions prior to 3.2]. May be we should namely
> speaks about OpenOffice.org.
>
Removed completely, LibO uses its own config di
Hi Thorsten, all,
On 16/11/2010 08:14, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi folks,
after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
the links as such mak
Hi Thorsten, *,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>
> after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
> documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
> cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
> the links as
Hi folks,
after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
the links as such make sense.
Thanks,
-- Thorsten
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/
