Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-25 Thread Noel Grandin
Cool, thanks! Michael Stahl wrote: On 20/10/11 09:00, Noel Grandin wrote: Hi Building on Windows using Visual Studio, running into a build error in ScriptProviderForJava. Trimmed build log attached. Any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin have had this problem myself today, the command for

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-24 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/10/11 09:00, Noel Grandin wrote: Hi Building on Windows using Visual Studio, running into a build error in ScriptProviderForJava. Trimmed build log attached. Any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin have had this problem myself today, the command for compiling java files does not do the

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-24 Thread night striker
Here is my build_error.log http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3450416/build_error.log build_error.log As I already stated, when I remove all mentions of adabasui, I no longer get the adabasuilo.so error, but I still get the sdbtlo.so error. I am not sure if adabasui is the problem, or

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-18 Thread night striker
Ok, I removed all mentions of adabasui from dbaccess/Module_dbaccess.mk and from scp2 and I am no longer getting the first error, but I still get collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [[...]/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/Library/libsdbtlo.so] Error 1 Should I find and remove

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 08:43 -0700, night striker wrote: Ok, I removed all mentions of adabasui from dbaccess/Module_dbaccess.mk and from scp2 and I am no longer getting the first error, but I still get Hokay :-) sounds good, I suppose we should remove the code they mention as well,

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 17:13 -0700, night striker wrote: Well, for some reason, it appears that something is looking for it when i build. Any ideas on how I can stop things from looking for this. Or is there a way to enable this adabas DB stuff so that it will build? Most

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Wasnt the adabas DB stuff removed or disabled or so I thought? On 13/10/2011 23:22, night striker wrote: The build fails for me in tail_build with these errors collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: ***

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-16 Thread night striker
Well, for some reason, it appears that something is looking for it when i build. Any ideas on how I can stop things from looking for this. Or is there a way to enable this adabas DB stuff so that it will build? -- View this message in context:

[Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-10-13 Thread night striker
The build fails for me in tail_build with these errors collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [[...]/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/Library/libadabasuilo.so] Error 1 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [[...]/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/Library/libsdbtlo.so] Error 1 Any

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-10 Thread Cor Nouws
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-08-11 19:43) On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: git complains that libo exists and is not empty. that is probably because libo was the name of the bootstrap you already have... you need to chose another name than libo (core ? )

[Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi *, Building LibreOffice now and then. Currently to look at some functions / dig a bit in the code. Low level experience. Working on Ubuntu. Previous successful build was from July 6 Yesterday I did a ./g pull -r on the master. (Didn't do any special action for the one-git transition, since

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Hi *, Building LibreOffice now and then. Currently to look at some functions / dig a bit in the code. Low level experience. Working on Ubuntu. Previous successful build was from July 6 Yesterday I did a ./g pull -r on the

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Cor Nouws
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-08-11 12:42) So you are still pulling 'master' from last friday... since the master you pulled is froozen read-only in bootstrap,artwork,base,calc, etc Hmm :-( what made you think that 'it was not needed for you' ? Combination of various, such as: - lack of

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread julien2412
Cor Nouws wrote: ... But hey, better then summing up more reasons: what command(s) do I use to move to the new master? ...___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Cor Nouws
julien2412 wrote (09-08-11 14:04) I don't think there's a script for this. Just create your local repo from scratch by following this url : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build (this page has been updated). Ah, thanks. I only looked at the 'get your first build' part

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-08-11 12:42) So you are still pulling 'master' from last friday... since the master you pulled is froozen read-only in bootstrap,artwork,base,calc, etc Hmm :-( what made you think that 'it

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: julien2412 wrote (09-08-11 14:04) I don't think there's a script for this. Just create your local repo from scratch by following this url : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build (this page has been

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

2011-08-09 Thread Cor Nouws
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-08-11 14:36) ohh! I see. No, you were not supposed to run that script :-) That is what I expected, but had the idea to look for some pointers. Anyhow: better ask advise right away the next time. so, all you need to do is git clone