On 11/29/2011 01:20 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
Stephan said he was interested in changing something there, but not
using cpp would definitely be a change that breaks backward
compatibility of the URE, and could only be done for LO 4, if at all.
Another option is to create a new syntax already bef
hi Tomas,
[i am assuming you accidentally replied just to me, not to the list?]
On 29/11/11 12:30, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Stahl writes:
>> which is a remnant from the dialog layout attempt and i have removed it
>
> thank you for the fixes.
>
> Is the UNO IDL syntax spe
On 24/11/11 14:16, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
>> heh, i fixed that a lot on Monday, after discovering that a lot of its
>> files were not listed in the makefile at all; please git pull and try
>> again :)
>
> Ah, sorry I didn't have the most recent repo.
>
> However, after pulling, it is still not poss
On 11/24/2011 08:24 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Are there any native implementations of the UNO RPC protocol so far,
e.g. for Java or is everybody going through FFI?
Java has its own, pure Java URP implementation. (And Java chickens out
with regard to reading types.rdb, in that it has its own co
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks writes:
> Ok :-) so you would have a native implementation of the UNO RPC
> protocol?
yes ;-)
>> At the moment, I parse IDL files and hope (or have to make sure) that
>> the installed libreoffice is compatible.
>
> So - in -theory- (for all interesting cases), the UNO
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 14:42 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> - I write my application in a dynamic programming language with no
> dependencies on libreoffice code;
Ok :-) so you would have a native implementation of the UNO RPC
protocol?
> - My application reads the type library (RDB or b
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks writes:
> No problem, but please reply-to-all so we CC the list, for others to
> find out what is going on & be helped by your questions too :-) [ feel
> free to CC the list on your reply to this ;-].
sorry it wasn't meant to be a private message, I need to check better
Hi Michael,
thanks for your reply!
> it is described somewhere on openoffice.org...
> ...but i can't find the well hidden documentation.
Same here:-(
> heh, i fixed that a lot on Monday, after discovering that a lot of its
> files were not listed in the makefile at all; please git pull and try
Hi Tomas,
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:02 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below.
It seems mst fixed them already, but thanks !
> Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and
> described somewhere?
Hah - that thi
On 23/11/11 18:02, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below.
>
> Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and
> described somewhere?
it is described somewhere on openoffice.org...
...but i can't find the well hidden docume
Hi all,
I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below.
Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and
described somewhere?
I've been parsing idl files from libreoffice git repository (offapi/ and
udkapi/) and hit some issues trying to #include dependencies.
The c
11 matches
Mail list logo
