Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-30 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 02:23 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. co

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably > > after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. > > construction without destruction somewh

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. construction without destruction somewhere. Thanks! You mean HttpRequest::~HttpRequest, right? I'm still w

[Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. construction without destruction somewhere. C> ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org h