<-Original Message->
>From: Michael Meeks [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] [ml-node
>+1834110-443277665-232...@n3.nabble.com]
>Sent: 11/3/2010 4:19:16 AM
> ... Wrt. re-doing the dialog layout - can you
>hold off on that - Ricardo is working now on some awesome new VCL
layout
>cap
Hi LeMoyne,
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 23:35 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> [PATCH] Fixes char overcount when selection ends in middle of word
> Patch in sw changes only one object: sw/source/core/txtedt.cxx
..
> The paragraph count is held on the same DocStat record as the word and char
> counts and is al
[PATCH] Fixes char overcount when selection ends in middle of word
Patch in sw changes only one object: sw/source/core/txtedt.cxx
Error was reported by Sophie Gautier on bug 30550
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30550
The basic fix is very simple: change the SwScanner constructor
Hi Wols,
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 23:56 +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Anyone particularly brave that feels able to replicate the calc
> > regression tests for writer out there ?
>
> I know I'm butting in without knowing the details, but what do you mean
> by "the right result".
Ah
On 28/10/10 10:38, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:42 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
>> Using the following sample from a git patch one can see one way in which the
>> current counting method comes up with fewer words than other methods do.
>> +1747,9
> Well - this is fu
Hi guys,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:42 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> Using the following sample from a git patch one can see one way in which the
> current counting method comes up with fewer words than other methods do.
> +1747,9
Well - this is fun indeed :-) I strongly suggest that we start t
