Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 06:50 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > - CPPUNITTESTER=$(AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH_LOCAL) $(GDBCPPUNITTRACE) > > $(SOLARBINDIR)/cppunittester > > + CPPUNITTESTER=$(AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH_LOCAL) $(GDBCPPUNITTRACE) gdb > > --args $(SOLARBINDIR)/cppunittester > Actually, no tweaking is ne

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-09 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:52:31AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 03:21 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > Is that the end of the build? > > Yup, good news. > > > (Where did the nice graphics go? ;) ) > > > > Thank you! How do we continue with this? > > Well, make dev-ins

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-07 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:21:06AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Multiprocessing build is finished > Maximal number of processes run: 1 > > Is that the end of the build? (Where did the nice graphics go? ;) ) Yes - the asciiart is part of build.git - it could be ported here. ;) pgpU6xS5BdCgz

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-07 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 03:21 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > With a new pull and your patch applied, I get to: > No EPM: do no packaging at this stage Looks good to me :-) > Multiprocessing build is finished > Maximal number of processes run: 1 > > Is that the end of the build?

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-07 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 03:21 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Is that the end of the build? Yup, good news. > (Where did the nice graphics go? ;) ) > > Thank you! How do we continue with this? Well, make dev-install and see if it runs :-) The _exit is of course a temporary hack, but it tests th

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-06 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:18:38PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Bah, let me rethink that. I guess its very possible that _exit doesn't > flush standard I/O on NetBSD which might indeed cause an empty > generated .hxx. I've just pushed a fflush into that generator to help > test the theory. Try a

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-06 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:07 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:44 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:01:53PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > One horrific temporary hack to test a theory would be to call _exit to > > > skip calling the massive dtor

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-06 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:44 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:01:53PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > One horrific temporary hack to test a theory would be to call _exit to > > skip calling the massive dtor chain which OOo builds up. Though that's > > not a cure, just a t

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-06 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:01:53PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > One horrific temporary hack to test a theory would be to call _exit to > skip calling the massive dtor chain which OOo builds up. Though that's > not a cure, just a temp hack, but maybe it'll help isolate this. I'm confused why, bu

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:57 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > The build on NetBSD currently fails with: > > Entering /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/sc/qa/unit > > -- > - start unit test #1 on library ../../unxbsdx3.pro/lib/libqa_unit.so > --

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > > -- > > - start unit test #1 on library ../../unxbsdx3.pro/lib/libqa_unit.so > > -- > > So - I would cut/paste the command-line; export the LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:57 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > The build on NetBSD currently fails with: > Entering /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/sc/qa/unit This is where we run our unit testing framework, which involves the first real(ish) run of great chunks of the code. > --

[Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2010-12-16 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I've switched back to the internal odbc library, since the external one gave me the BOOL errors. Strangely, "--with-system-odbc-headers=no" gives me an error by the configure script because it's not recognized, but it makes the configure script switch to the internal headers. Sebastian, want