Hi all,
subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
> subsequenttests
[ __.oO SCK ] loaded modules: chart2 comphelper configmgr dbaccess
editeng forms framework linguistic ooo padmin qadevOOo sal
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:22:43PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
> that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
Hi,
I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what is the relation between
unit t
Hi Miklos,
lengthy answer to your innocent question ahead -- brace for impact.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:18:20 +0200
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what is the relation between
> unit tests, smoketest and subsequenttests?
There is a whole lot of terms flying around
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 01:22 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> BTW not all subsequent tests are in Java, some are in C++ too. Thus also
> not every cppunit test is run during the build currently.
Ooh - good point; do the java tests get skipped if we have Java
disabled ? [ a number of peopl
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:50 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> personally I'd encourage writing many more unit tests run during the
> build,
Currently unfortunately I think that all of our "large app" unit tests,
sw, sc, starmath and sd are now all disabled/not ported to new build
system yet, so we sh
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:50:05 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Ooh - good point; do the java tests get skipped if we have
> Java disabled ? [ a number of people build that way for speed / ease
> ].
Not yet, but it would not be hard to implement. Although the subsequent
c++ tests ar
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
> that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
>
Neat, let me try that on one of the tinderboxen - would then be in
favour of running it unconditionally.
Cheers,
-- Thor
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:18 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
> > that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
> >
> Neat, let me try that on one of the tinderboxen - wou
Hi Caolán, Hi Thorsten,
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:52:13 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:18 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > > subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very
> > > stable that way. These tests are very good to p
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:56 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:50 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > personally I'd encourage writing many more unit tests run during the
> > build,
>
> Currently unfortunately I think that all of our "large app" unit tests,
> sw, sc, starmath a
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:59 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:56 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:50 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > personally I'd encourage writing many more unit tests run during the
> > > build,
> >
> > Currently unfortunately I
Hi Caolán,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:18:02 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> a) add a gbuild rule to make a services.rdb from the test_components
> list in e.g. sc/qa/unit roughly the same way as the makefile.mk does
> it
> I have to admit the gmake files have defeated me on "a)", but it
> should be
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 14:06 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Doing something "custom" unfortunately has still way too much
> boilerplate in gbuild esp. for small tasks. You can find an example in
> tools where:
I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
C.
_
Hi Caolán,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:34:24 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
Yes, I also wanted to answer here, but could not find the thread
anymore ;)
Anyway: I also just cherrypicked that to 3-4 upon koheis request. I hope
I didnt break a
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 18:37 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Anyway: I also just cherrypicked that to 3-4 upon koheis request.
After a bit of struggling today I see that under windows we need to
a) convert the /cygdrive/path/to/each/.o in the extraobjects back to
C:\path\to\each\.o so I hazarded
15 matches
Mail list logo
