Re: killing soffice.bin from oosplash (was: Re: [REVIEW][3-5] misc stuff)

2012-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 19 of April 2012, Michael Stahl wrote: > the soffice.bin really should be dead by the time the JUnit test process > exits, because otherwise the next time you try to run the test it won't > run (and even worse will hang forever currently...), because the old > soffice.bin is still liste

killing soffice.bin from oosplash (was: Re: [REVIEW][3-5] misc stuff)

2012-04-19 Thread Michael Stahl
On 19/04/12 13:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 04/17/2012 03:15 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: >> have oosplash forward SIGTERM to soffice.bin: >> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=946e7180be96178937e7be1b0bd7132902709a87 > > The above is not a good idea. At least with POSIX,

Re: [REVIEW][3-5] misc stuff

2012-04-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 04/17/2012 03:15 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: have oosplash forward SIGTERM to soffice.bin: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=946e7180be96178937e7be1b0bd7132902709a87 The above is not a good idea. At least with POSIX, there is no reliable way for a parent process to forw

[REVIEW][3-5] misc stuff

2012-04-17 Thread Michael Stahl
some misc commits that would make sense for libreoffice-3-5: EMF+ valgrind warning http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=24b449b7fcaaee20ef8feebfd64fc761535f77a8 headless UI dialogs blocking terminate fix: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=eb237af5aa0a5d8