OK, I pushed to master
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5db7ac239278634c39cbb15f0173db0524b5dcd6
which *I* consider as a good solution. I checked around other unzip
implementations and it does not look like they consider the timestamp
differences as a brokenness.
Cheers
F.
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:30 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
OK, I pushed to master
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5db7ac239278634c39cbb15f0173db0524b5dcd6
which *I* consider as a good solution. I checked around other unzip
implementations and it does not look like they
Hi guys,
I've not worked out where these odd ZIP container inconsistencies are
coming from, but ... since people appear to see them, presumably it's
worth being more accepting:
Not 100% confident about this, the more I read SfxMedium friends, the
more convinced I am we need some
First of all, the timestamps in that file are really bogus, I cannot
imagine an ooxml file produces in 2004, only if the machine has wrongly
set the clock.
Second, when working on a zip implementation for libcdr and for the LO
shell extension, I realized that the timestamps were never really good
Ah, the timestamp actually is not a time_t, they are two shorts (2 bytes
long) from which the first one gives the modification time and the second the
modification date. So the difference can be some seconds. It is possible that
some zip implementations dump the timestamps of the directory
