On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:33:21AM +0200, Michael Stahl
wrote:
> it does look like this one really does lack a since tag, and it should
> have one, hence it's really a bug. i've fixed that now, please somebody
> backport 2af8619ac052f54b258865edb6937c6fe820da5d to libreoffice-3-5.
Makes sense,
On 30/06/12 21:32, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:27:44PM -0700, Joel Madero
> wrote:
>> Friendly discussion about if we can commit to putting a "minimum version"
>> or a "since" on our API documentation. We've had a user put in a bug report
>> (I closed as not a bug but thought
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:27:44PM -0700, Joel Madero
wrote:
> Friendly discussion about if we can commit to putting a "minimum version"
> or a "since" on our API documentation. We've had a user put in a bug report
> (I closed as not a bug but thought it was valid anyways) that we don't
> consist
Hi All,
Friendly discussion about if we can commit to putting a "minimum version"
or a "since" on our API documentation. We've had a user put in a bug report
(I closed as not a bug but thought it was valid anyways) that we don't
consistently -- or more accurately, rarely ever -- put a minimum vers
