Re: About ucbdemo (still used?)

2013-01-21 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 11:56 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > But it's likely better to err here in favour of a > clean, small repo and just remove any bitrotten */workben/ code. Agreed - -but- IMHO some of that workben stuff is really things that -should- have been turned into unit tests

Re: About ucbdemo (still used?)

2013-01-21 Thread julien2412
-- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-ucbdemo-still-used-tp4030414p4030911.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.

Re: About ucbdemo (still used?)

2013-01-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 01/19/2013 06:05 PM, julien2412 wrote: Cppcheck detected this: ucb/workben/ucb/ucbdemo.cxx 1735syntaxError error Invalid number of character (() when these macros are defined: ''. I fixed parenthesis (there was not just one problem) but I don't know how to check this since "make uc

About ucbdemo (still used?)

2013-01-19 Thread julien2412
lls: make: *** No rule to make target `ucbdemo'. Stop. (even if I run this in /ucb/workben/ucb Is ucbdemo still used? How to build it? Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-ucbdemo-still-used-tp4030414.html Sent from the Dev mail