Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-20 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/19/2015 06:34 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: What else can I do, add to every commit message a line that say: "This list all the source shas since the last bibisect commit.. for this bibisect commit this list contain source commit" :-) Oh, this has never been about what you should do. It

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)! A reminder when updating a bug with

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)! A reminder when updating a bug with

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: A reminder when updating a bug with information about a successful bibisecting: Do not only paste the commit message of the first bad bibisect repo commit, but:

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann >> wrote: >>> >>> A reminder when updating a bug with information about a successful >>>

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: >> >> A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of >> regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being >> the lucky one to

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: >> >> A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of >> regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being >> the lucky one to

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/19/2015 05:10 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/19/2015 04:53 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: A reminder when updating a bug with

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/19/2015 05:41 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann >> wrote: >>> >>> But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit >>>

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit message > mentions a range of more than one source commits. > No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/19/2015 05:41 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: But that example is irrelevant to what I wrote above, as the commit message mentions a range of more than one source commits. No it is not irrelevant. with the bad

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:41:19AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > No it is not irrelevant. with the bad bibisect commit, say > c49af8fc6406f9e7e8e0b1dcebee6df87bdeb9aa > you immediately have the answer you seek: >

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/19/2015 06:05 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: The FULL RANGE here is that single source commit: c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 commit from the bibisect commit 193ccffc25300d5c26e6f30ab06a2315b6bff879 and I know it is a single because it is the only one listed.. if there was more

Re: Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/19/2015 06:05 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> The FULL RANGE here is that single source commit: >> c725ebaced006c02baeb9b0ee5ac6ac4625adc01 >> commit from the bibisect commit

Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi all, A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)! More here:

[Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi all, A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)! More here:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Joel Madero
Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? Best, Joel On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > Hi all, > > A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of > regressions, and a hearty

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Joel Madero
Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? Best, Joel On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > Hi all, > > A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of > regressions, and a hearty

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Joel Madero
On 10/16/2015 08:29 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? >> > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. > > (CLOSED bugs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. (CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of the total -- we don't seem to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

2015-10-16 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. (CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of the total -- we don't seem to