Re: Building Problem

Hi Nabil, Since these are just warnings, you may continue with the build procedure for now. And in the mean time, you can take a look at his thread about the same issue: http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/how-to-set-JAVA-HOME-td4250260.html You can also search for

Building Problem

Hi, My name is Nabil, a software engineering student at Polytechnique Montreal in Canada. I am interested in participating in GSoC this year, particularly with LIbreOffice, so, I'm new here in the world of contribution to open source projects. I started reading on how to apply and how to get invol

building problem

Hi : I am a mongolian, from InnerMogolia of China and very interested in libreoffice. But, Is the web site 'wiki .documentfoundation.org/Develoment/BuildingOnWindows' right, or stable? I have never succeed in building a libreoffice. How can I build a successful one. Thank you, Thankyou!

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, cppunit, libcppunit undefined reference to dlopen

Hi Michael, This is the end of strace output: Process 8798 resumed Process 8799 detached [pid 8798] --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- Process 8797 resumed Process 8798 detached --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- open("/usr/share/locale-langpack/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/make.mo", O_RDONLY

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, cppunit, libcppunit undefined reference to dlopen

Hi Joost, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > I missed the e-mail about moving from rawbuild to native build, so I > did remove the old installation. :-) > Then I did a new Native Build installation as described on the wiki > page. Great. > make[2]: Enter

[Libreoffice] Building problem, cppunit, libcppunit undefined reference to dlopen

I missed the e-mail about moving from rawbuild to native build, so I did remove the old installation. Then I did a new Native Build installation as described on the wiki page. I failed with this dl problem in cppunit: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/joost/work/git/libo/clone/libs-extern/cppuni

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

Problem 1: solved. The build did now succeeded. Problem 2: solved. I do always first run: . ./ooenv "./soffice" and "./soffice.bin" now both start writer "./soffice -calc" and "./soffice.bin -calc" both start calc. I really had this ./soffice.bin.bin problem, but it is now solved. Joost 2010/11/

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Fine that it is fixes, thanks. The build and the install succeeded with my own fix. I just did not like to do another pull, because that takes a lot of time to build. I let my computer build at night. If the build brakes (with running "make"), it will take me another night. If I fix the problems l

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:51 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi, > I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. > > I did some local hack with #undef, to get it building again. [...] I fixed a bug in this area, should be good now thanks, Noel __

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. > Should be fixed on master, please pull latest changes. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgplJkZmzhzbu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.

[Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Hi, I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. I did some local hack with #undef, to get it building again. #ifdef DEBUG #include namespace writerfilter { namespace dmapper { extern TagLogger::Pointer_t dmapper_logger; } } #else #undef DEBUG_ELEMENT #undef DEBUG_C

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

I did not do "git pull -r && bin/g pull -r", so I got the same problem. Thus I did the pull, copied the file from the rawbuild to the build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/sc/source/ui/src directory and then ran "build" in build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2. Now that part of the build is OK. I had just bad karma wit

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

I did make clean make The make clean removed the the complete build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2 directory. It is now building 2 hours and I will see tomorrow-morning what the result is. Tomorrow-evening (after my work and helping my son with mail-delivering) I will report if it works. Joost 2010/11/22

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

Hi, I know...but I had exactly this problem once, and the make clean did not solved the issue. At the end, I did this an evening, and all went well the next day. I would be interested to know if the make clean works for you. Thanks Pierre-André On 11/22/2010 10:48 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 07:57 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > hello, > rm -rf * > ./download Oh - that is going to waste a -lot- of time ;-) Just remove the build output, not the ( pristine ) git repos. 'make clean' should do that in the top-level.

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

On 11/22/2010 07:16 AM, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi, > > PROBLEM 1: > > I am trying to make again, but it fails on > > ./sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src > > I did remove the unxlngx6.pro in the sc, and did > the build there locally and it gave: > > > Making:ui.srs > > {

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

At 1:16am -0500 Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: PROBLEM 2: Will have to let someone else respond to problem 1, but I believe problem 2 to be fairly simple to solve: The problem I had on the previous build: I had a good build and did an install, but the I could not run the program wi

[Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

Hi, PROBLEM 1: I am trying to make again, but it fails on ./sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src I did remove the unxlngx6.pro in the sc, and did the build there locally and it gave: Making:ui.srs { ^ f4101: "optdlg.src", line 118: Warning in the object (Type: FixedLine): Resources without name a

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, OpenSuse 10.3, 64bits, javac

2010/11/8 Joost Eekhoorn > I have switched from Ubuntu to OpenSuse. > This OpenSuse is a bare system with the latest update, thus OpenSuse 10.3. > I removed the OpenOffice. > > Then I tried: > sudo zypper si -d OpenOffice_org-bootstrap > but that did not work. I say that 10.3 was not yet defined,

[Libreoffice] Building problem, OpenSuse 10.3, 64bits, javac

I have switched from Ubuntu to OpenSuse. This OpenSuse is a bare system with the latest update, thus OpenSuse 10.3. I removed the OpenOffice. Then I tried: sudo zypper si -d OpenOffice_org-bootstrap but that did not work. I say that 10.3 was not yet defined, thus I did the required installations m