Hi Michael,
I have implemented a feature for checking VLC version. Still wait your
comments about include files for LibVLC in Mac builds :).
All the best,
Minh
Minh Ngo |
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fre
>
> Could anybody
> check it for successful compiling on Windows? Thanks.
>
>
It still requires libvlc headers, is that intentional?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
I have changed some code to load libraries symbols only once and have
wrote some stuff to detect VLC on Windows platforms [1]. Could anybody
check it for successful compiling on Windows? Thanks.
All the best,
Minh
[1] https://gerrit.libre
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> As far as I know VLC has exactly the same dependency on precise, raring,
> quantal and saucy.
... unlike LibreOffice for example. ;)
Best,
Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreO
On 23/08/13 17:36, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 23 Aug, bjoern wrote :
>> This is of course because the "split into 173 mis-configured pieces" fate is
>> carefully reserved by packagers for those upstreams that carelessly add 5
>> exciting new external dependencies with each major release ...
>
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 17:09 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> libvlc_get_version is not enough?
We can be sure that it is digit+.digit+.digit+ followed by non-digits ?
if so, fine I guess.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itin
On 23 Aug, bjoern wrote :
> This is of course because the "split into 173 mis-configured pieces" fate is
> carefully reserved by packagers for those upstreams that carelessly add 5
> exciting new external dependencies with each major release ...
Like?
As far as I know VLC has exactly the same dep
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 23 Aug, Michael Meeks wrote :
> > > Linux, what do you mean pre-broken?
> >
> > I fully expect that every Linux packager in the world looks at VLC and
> > says: "but really this is 173 packages bundled together, of which
On 23 Aug, Michael Meeks wrote :
> Any chance of an easy-to-check version method a-la gtk that we can
> depend on ?
libvlc_get_version is not enough?
> > Linux, what do you mean pre-broken?
>
> I fully expect that every Linux packager in the world looks at VLC and
> says: "but reall
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:53 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> Very very strong API stability on libVLC.
Great news :-)
> API functions are added, that's it. Nothing is removed, ABI is kept.
> Extension of API gets with newer functions, if needed.
Any chance of an easy-to-check
Hello,
On 21 Aug, Michael Meeks wrote :
> 1. we need to be sure of the API guarentees around libvlc
> + JB - what API guarentees do you have there ?
Very very strong API stability on libVLC.
API functions are added, that's it. Nothing is removed, ABI is kept.
Extension of API
Hi guys,
I just cherry-picked Minh's nice work to master; and it looks in
reasonably good shape. As such, it's prolly good to go through the last
few pieces we need to get sorted out before enabling it by default on
master. JB we'll need some help from you here I think.
1. we need
12 matches
Mail list logo
