On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:14:18PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane
wrote:
> I don't know what cache you are talking about. If some binary (as
> opposed to XML) format got changed incompatibly, then yes, this is
> bad.
Judging from the strings in the memory garbage I saw in gdb, this is
used in ~/.conf
On 25/04/13 13:29, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> TemplateContent::TemplateContent gets an INetURLObject, and the next
> assert fails, as GetProtocol() is INET_PROT_NOT_VALID. If you step up
> the backtrace in gdb, you see that the "URL" was ~memory garbage.
>
> On the other hand, for now I would just cha
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:29:00PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane
> wrote:
>> If you can point valgrind/gdb it yourself and point me towards the
>> place / stacktrace that allocates "a lot", I can look at that place
>> and see if I get i
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane
wrote:
> So I gather that "the issue" is that saving this document makes
> LibreOffice eat unreasonable amounts of memory.
No, saving the docx attachment as odf is (more or less) fine. But then
reading back the odf results in eating to
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:24:37PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:26:35AM +0200, Miklos Vajna
> wrote:
>> I'll bisect it later today.
> git bisect says:
> 9830fd36dbdb72c79703b0c61efc027fba793c5a is the first bad commit
> commit 9830fd36dbdb72c79703b0c61efc027fba793c5a
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> I'll bisect it later today.
>
I wonder if 9830fd36dbdb72c79703b0c61efc027fba793c5a is related - it
modifies the binary format of the templatefoldercache ...
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Li
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:26:35AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> I'll bisect it later today.
git bisect says:
9830fd36dbdb72c79703b0c61efc027fba793c5a is the first bad commit
commit 9830fd36dbdb72c79703b0c61efc027fba793c5a
Author: Lionel Elie Mamane
Date: Sun Mar 17 08:36:26 2013 +0100
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:44:13PM +0200, Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> We have a crash (on systems with low memory) or hang (with more memory)
> in templates. It is a problem with all templates but one can see it in
> impress directly, because the template previews are part of the standard
> side
Hello, good people,
We have a crash (on systems with low memory) or hang (with more memory)
in templates. It is a problem with all templates but one can see it in
impress directly, because the template previews are part of the standard
side-bar and we regenerate the template cache there.
I invest
